zopaf-mcp
Negotiation math engine for AI agents. Computes Pareto frontiers, generates iso-utility counteroffers, and infers counterpart priorities. 9 tools for any multi-issue negotiation. Zero LLM tokens — pure MILP optimization.
README
Zopaf Negotiation Engine -- MCP Server
A negotiation math engine exposed as MCP tools that any AI agent can call. Zopaf computes Pareto frontiers, generates iso-utility counteroffers, and infers counterpart priorities from their reactions -- all through pure MILP optimization. Zero LLM tokens burned. The calling agent handles the conversation; Zopaf handles the math.
Quick Start
Claude Desktop
Add to your Claude Desktop configuration (claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"zopaf": {
"type": "streamable-http",
"url": "https://zopaf-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp"
}
}
}
Claude Code
claude mcp add zopaf --transport streamable-http https://zopaf-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp
Generic MCP Client
Connect to the Streamable HTTP endpoint:
URL: https://zopaf-mcp-production.up.railway.app/mcp
Transport: Streamable HTTP
Tools Reference
| Tool | Description |
|---|---|
create_session |
Create a new negotiation session. Returns a session_id used by all other tools. |
add_issue |
Add a negotiable issue/term with options ordered worst to best for the user. |
set_issue_range |
Set the acceptable range for a numeric issue, enabling 0-100 scoring. |
record_preference |
Record that the user prioritizes some issues over others. Updates the weight model. |
set_batna |
Record the user's alternatives if the deal falls through. Determines leverage. |
generate_counteroffers |
Generate 3 iso-utility counteroffers to present simultaneously. |
process_counterpart_response |
Process the counterpart's reaction to infer their priorities and generate a round-2 offer. |
analyze_deal |
Score a specific deal against the Pareto frontier. Shows value captured and suggested trades. |
get_negotiation_state |
Get current model state: issues, weights, BATNA, frontier size, and recommended next step. |
How It Works
-
Create session -- Initialize a new negotiation model with
create_session. -
Add issues -- Define the terms on the table with
add_issue. Each issue includes options ordered worst to best for the user (e.g., Salary:['$150K', '$160K', '$170K', '$180K']). -
Set ranges -- For numeric issues, call
set_issue_rangeto map values onto a 0-100 scoring scale. -
Record preferences -- Call
record_preferenceas you learn what the user cares about. Each call updates the internal weight model. -
Set BATNA -- Use
set_batnato record alternatives. The number and quality determines leverage strength and anchoring strategy. -
Generate 3 counteroffers -- Call
generate_counteroffersto produce three packages that are equally good for the user but structured differently. Present ALL THREE simultaneously. Never lead with one and fall back to another. -
Process counterpart response -- Call
process_counterpart_responsewith which package they preferred and what they pushed back on. The engine infers their hidden priorities. -
Get round-2 offer -- Returns a refined offer on the efficient frontier, with value split weighted by leverage.
Example: Job Offer Negotiation
create_session
-> {"session_id": "a1b2c3d4"}
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Salary", options=["$150K", "$160K", "$170K", "$180K"])
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Equity", options=["0.1%", "0.25%", "0.5%", "0.75%"])
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Signing Bonus", options=["$0", "$10K", "$20K", "$30K"])
add_issue(session_id="a1b2c3d4", issue_name="Remote Work", options=["On-site", "Hybrid", "Fully Remote"])
set_issue_range(issue_name="Salary", worst_acceptable=150000, best_hoped=180000,
option_values={"$150K": 150000, "$160K": 160000, "$170K": 170000, "$180K": 180000})
-> {"scores": {"$150K": 0.0, "$160K": 33.3, "$170K": 66.7, "$180K": 100.0}}
record_preference(preferred_issues=["Salary", "Equity"], over_issues=["Signing Bonus", "Remote Work"])
-> {"learned_weights": {"Salary": 0.345, "Equity": 0.345, "Signing Bonus": 0.155, "Remote Work": 0.155}}
set_batna(alternatives=["Competing offer from Company B at $165K", "Stay in current role"])
-> {"leverage_strength": "strong"}
generate_counteroffers(target_satisfaction="ambitious")
-> {
"counteroffers": [
{"label": "A", "terms": {"Salary": "$180K", "Equity": "0.25%", "Signing Bonus": "$10K", "Remote Work": "On-site"}},
{"label": "B", "terms": {"Salary": "$170K", "Equity": "0.5%", "Signing Bonus": "$0", "Remote Work": "Hybrid"}},
{"label": "C", "terms": {"Salary": "$160K", "Equity": "0.75%", "Signing Bonus": "$20K", "Remote Work": "On-site"}}
]
}
process_counterpart_response(preferred_package="B", pushback_issues=["Equity"])
-> {
"counterpart_priorities_inferred": {"Equity": 0.571, "Salary": 0.143, ...},
"round_2_offer": {"Salary": "$180K", "Equity": "0.25%", "Signing Bonus": "$20K", "Remote Work": "Hybrid"},
"value_split": "User gets 75% of surplus"
}
The engine inferred that the counterpart cares most about equity (57% of their weight). The round-2 offer concedes on equity -- where it costs the user less -- and captures value on salary and signing bonus. Both sides improve. The user captures 75% of the surplus based on their strong BATNA.
Use Cases
- Job offers -- Salary, equity, bonus, title, remote work, start date, PTO
- VC term sheets -- Valuation, board seats, liquidation preferences, anti-dilution, pro-rata rights
- Real estate -- Price, closing date, contingencies, repairs, inclusions, rent-back periods
- Vendor contracts -- Price, SLA guarantees, payment terms, exclusivity, renewal clauses
- Salary negotiations -- Base pay, bonus structure, review timeline, scope of role
- Business partnerships -- Revenue split, IP ownership, decision rights, exit clauses, territory
- Legal settlements -- Monetary terms, non-disclosure terms, admission of liability, timeline
Why Zero Tokens?
Zopaf is a math engine, not a language model. It runs MILP optimization and combinatorial scoring -- operations that are computationally cheap but tedious for an LLM to attempt in-context.
Your agent's LLM handles the conversation with the user, asks the right questions, and explains the strategy. Zopaf handles the optimization -- computing Pareto frontiers, generating iso-utility packages, solving preference weights from revealed choices, and positioning offers on the efficient frontier.
You bring the brain. Zopaf brings the calculator.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.