web3-agents-mcp
An MCP server that bridges ERC-8004 agent identity, reputation, and validation registries into tool calls, enabling discovery, inspection, and verification of on-chain AI agents from any MCP client.
README
<div align="center">
web3-agents-mcp
Discover, inspect, and verify on-chain AI agents — from any MCP client.
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that bridges
ERC-8004 agent identity, reputation, and
validation registries into tool calls any AI agent can make. One server, every supported
chain — each tool takes a chain argument.
</div>
📋 Table of contents
- Why
- Quickstart
- Example prompts
- Tools
- Design principles
- Supported chains
- Configuration
- Verification semantics
- Feedback honesty
- Development
- Roadmap
- License
🤔 Why
AI agents are starting to hire, pay, and delegate to other agents. ERC-8004 ("Trustless Agents") gives them an on-chain trust layer — identity, reputation, and validation registries on 20+ EVM chains — but until now an LLM agent had no way to read it from inside its tool loop.
web3-agents-mcp closes that gap. Before your agent trusts a counterparty, it can ask: Who owns this agent? Is its registration file authentic? What feedback has it received — and from whom? Has anyone independently validated its work?
🚀 Quickstart
npx web3-agents-mcp
Pre-publish: run from a checkout instead —
pnpm install && pnpm build && node dist/server/index.js
Claude Code:
claude mcp add web3-agents -- npx web3-agents-mcp
Claude Desktop (claude_desktop_config.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"web3-agents": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["web3-agents-mcp"]
}
}
}
Any other MCP client: spawn npx web3-agents-mcp as a child process and speak MCP
over stdio. The server never opens a network port.
💬 Example prompts
Once connected, just ask your agent naturally:
"Which chains does the web3-agents server support?"
"Look up ERC-8004 agent #1 on Base — who owns it and what does it do?"
"Is agent #42's registration file cryptographically verified?"
"Show me the raw feedback entries for agent #1 on Base, including who submitted them."
"Should I trust agent #0 on Polygon for a code-review task? Pull the on-chain facts."
🧰 Tools
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
list_chains |
Configured chains: slug, chainId, registry addresses, default flag |
resolve_agent |
Identity record by agentId or owner: owner, tokenUri, endpoints, capabilities |
get_registration_file |
The agent's full registration file, fetched and hash-verified (data:/ipfs:///https://) |
get_reputation |
Feedback summary + optional raw per-client entries (address, score, tag), paginated |
get_validations |
Independent validation entries: validator, method (TEE/ZK/re-execution), result |
assess_trust |
Composite factual report: identity + file verification + reputation + validations + caveats + plain-language summary |
search_agents |
Capability search (indexer backend — MVP ships a stub) |
ping |
Liveness + version |
Full input/output schemas, defaults, and error codes are generated from source into
docs/tools.md (pnpm docs:gen). A real captured transcript is in
docs/demo.md.
🛡️ Design principles
🔒 Read-only by design
No private keys, no signing, no write operations — every tool reads public state. An MCP tool surface reachable by an LLM must never have an injection path into on-chain actions (spending funds, changing registrations, submitting feedback). If a task needs a write, it needs a different, explicitly authorized tool — not this one.
⚖️ No scoring by design
There is no numeric score, confidence level, or star rating anywhere in this server's output. It hands back verified on-chain facts plus mandatory honesty caveats; weighing them into a trust decision is the consuming agent's job. A server that quietly compresses "57 feedback entries, all from one address, no independent validation" into a single number is making a judgment call it has no business making on the consumer's behalf.
⛓️ Supported chains
| Chain | chain value |
chainId | Supported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum Mainnet | ethereum |
1 | ✅ |
| Base Mainnet | base |
8453 | ✅ |
| Polygon PoS | polygon |
137 | ✅ |
| Arbitrum One | arbitrum |
42161 | ✅ |
| OP Mainnet | optimism |
10 | ✅ |
| BNB Smart Chain | bnb |
56 | ✅ |
| Gnosis Chain | gnosis |
100 | ✅ |
Registry addresses are identical on every chain (CREATE2). Adding a chain is one entry in
src/chains/config.ts; agents discover the live list via the list_chains tool, and the
chain enum in every tool's schema updates automatically.
⚙️ Configuration
All configuration is via environment variables; every tool call still takes an explicit
chain argument, so these are defaults, not global switches.
| Variable | Default | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
DEFAULT_CHAIN_ID |
8453 (Base) |
Chain id used by any tool call that omits chain. |
RPC_URL_<chainId> |
none (built-in public RPC list per chain) | Overrides/prepends the RPC endpoint used for that specific chain id, e.g. RPC_URL_8453. |
CACHE_DIR |
~/.cache/web3-agents-mcp |
Directory for the local sqlite cache of fetched registration files. |
IPFS_GATEWAYS |
https://ipfs.io,https://cloudflare-ipfs.com,https://gateway.pinata.cloud |
Comma-separated list of IPFS HTTP gateways to try, in order, for ipfs:// registration files. |
LOG_LEVEL |
info |
One of error, warn, info, debug; controls stderr log verbosity. |
INDEX_BACKEND |
null |
Selects the search_agents backend. Only null (the MVP stub, always INDEX_UNAVAILABLE) is implemented; a real local-index backend ships in a future release. |
🔍 Verification semantics
A registration file's verified field means different things depending on how the agent's
tokenUri points at it (per the v1 ERC-8004 contracts this server targets):
tokenUri scheme |
verified value |
Why |
|---|---|---|
data: URI |
true |
The content is embedded directly in the on-chain tokenUri; there is nothing to fetch or spoof. |
ipfs:// |
true or false |
The file is fetched from an IPFS gateway and its content hash is checked against the CID in the URI — an explicit false means that check failed. |
https:// |
null |
Unverifiable: v1 has no on-chain hash commitment for https://-hosted files, so this server cannot confirm the fetched bytes are what the agent actually committed to. null is a distinct, deliberate value — never conflated with false. |
🧂 Feedback honesty
get_reputation and assess_trust always attach caveats to feedback-derived data, because
on-chain feedback has real, structural weaknesses that no aggregation can paper over:
- There is no canonical score scale enforced by the registry; averages are clamped to 0-100 and may overstate quality relative to whatever scale a given client actually used.
- Feedback is submitted by arbitrary addresses and is Sybil-able — nothing stops one party from submitting many entries under different addresses.
These caveats are deterministic and unremovable: they are always present in the output, not an opt-in flag.
🛠️ Development
pnpm install
pnpm dev # build then run the stdio server
pnpm build # compile TypeScript to dist/
pnpm test # run the vitest suite (excludes live-chain fork tests)
pnpm test:fork # run the live-chain fork tests against public RPCs
pnpm lint # eslint + prettier --check
pnpm typecheck # tsc --noEmit
pnpm docs:gen # regenerate docs/tools.md from the tool schemas
Project layout:
src/chains— per-chain static config (registry addresses, deployment blocks, RPC URLs).src/registry— typed reads against the identity/reputation/validation ERC-8004 contracts.src/fetcher— registration-file retrieval, hashing/CID verification, and the sqlite cache.src/trust—assess_trust's orchestration, deterministic caveats, and summary text.src/indexer—search_agentsbackend contract and the MVPNullBackendstub.src/tools— one module per MCP tool: input/output zod schemas plus the tool function.src/server— MCP server wiring, tool registration, and the stdio entry point.src/shared— theResult/BridgeErrortypes and the stderr logger used everywhere.
Contributor/agent guidelines live in AGENTS.md.
🗺️ Roadmap
- [ ] Local search indexer — real
search_agentsbackend (SQLite log backfill, resumable) - [ ] Endpoint liveness checks — flag agents whose advertised endpoints are dead
- [ ] Streamable HTTP transport — hosted/shared deployments
- [ ] npm release —
npx web3-agents-mcpwithout a checkout - [ ] More chains (one config entry each)
📄 License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.