Quilt
Quilt gives every AI agent line-level authorship in a shared Git checkout, so multiple agents work in one repo, and each commits only its own lines, with symbol-level claims that block collisions before any bytes change.
README
Quilt
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.wkoverfield/quilt -->
Quilt is a command-line tool that tracks which agent wrote which lines in a shared Git checkout, so multiple AI coding agents can work in one repo at once and each commits only its own changes.
It captures every edit at the tool boundary, keeps a per-line record of who wrote
what, and reconstructs each agent's own changes at commit time. Git stays the
source of truth. Quilt never calls an LLM or spawns agents, and its state lives in
a .quilt/ sidecar you can delete without touching your repo.

npm install -g @quilt-dev/cli
quilt setup # wire Quilt into your repo (Claude Code, Cursor, or plain git)
The problem
You want your agents in ONE checkout: one node_modules, one build, one dev
server, one environment to keep working, not a worktree per agent, each with
its own install and its own drift. But on a shared checkout, plain git bites
even when agents work on completely different things: the first git commit -am
sweeps everyone else's uncommitted files into one blob, codegen and lockfile
churn get credited to whoever committed last, and two agents occasionally do
land on the same line, where one silently overwrites the other. None of that
requires agents to be working on the same task. It's just what a shared
checkout does by default.
Quilt makes the shared checkout safe. Every agent commits exactly its own lines and nothing else: disjoint work stays disjoint all the way into history, with no ceremony. And when two agents genuinely want the same code, that becomes a coordinated handoff instead of a silent loss. It holds as you add agents.
./examples/fleet.sh runs seven agents against one checkout. The two endings:
WITHOUT quilt 1 commit for 7 agents — six got "nothing to commit", their
work swept into the first agent's blob. a7 silently
overwrote a1's change to getUser. a1's work is gone.
WITH quilt 6 clean commits, one per agent, each exactly its own lines.
a7's write into a1's claimed function was denied before any
bytes changed, with a1's stated intent in the denial.
When two agents want the same file
Fanning out on disjoint files is the easy case. The real test is contention. A denied claim isn't a dead end. It carries the holder's stated intent and when their lease lapses:
$ QUILT_ACTOR=builder-flows quilt claim deals.js flows.js --intent "wire flows to deals"
✗ denied deals.js (held by builder-friction)
builder-friction is: friction pass: rename + archive flags
their claim lapses 2026-07-04T22:12:05Z unless renewed
✓ claimed flows.js
So the blocked agent builds its granted files while it waits, re-claims after
the holder's commit auto-releases, and layers its change on top of the landed
one. Two clean commits, both changes in the file, nothing lost.
./examples/contention.sh runs the whole sequence on the real machinery.
What it does
- One shared checkout. Model humans, agents, and bots as actors editing one working tree, no worktree per agent.
- Line-level attribution.
commit --minecommits only your lines, even when they share a hunk with another actor's. - Symbol-level claims. Reserve
utils.js#formatPrice, not the whole file, so agents editing different functions never contend. Ten languages via tree-sitter; whole-file claims for the rest. - Collision prevention. A write into code another agent has claimed is denied, with the holder's stated intent, before any bytes change.
- Push-awareness. Claim a symbol that depends on a function another actor is changing, and Quilt warns you at claim time.
- Detect and preserve. If one actor overwrites another's uncommitted lines, Quilt snapshots the victim's version so nothing is silently lost.
Every commit Quilt produces is an ordinary Git commit. It trusts Git and never
rewrites it, and all state lives locally under .quilt/. No account, no daemon.
Quickstart
quilt setup # wire Quilt into the repo (MCP server, hooks, coordination)
quilt doctor # confirm it's wired and capture is flowing
That's it. Agents are named automatically: each Claude Code session or MCP connection gets its own id, so parallel agents are told apart with no setup. Set an explicit id when you want one that is stable across sessions:
QUILT_ACTOR=auth-agent claude # this agent's edits are attributed to auth-agent
Then each agent commits only its own lines:
quilt status # who owns what
quilt preview --mine # exact patch that would be committed
quilt commit --mine -m "fix auth redirect"
quilt fleet shows the whole picture: every actor, their claims, and anything
that needs a human. See docs/reference.md for the full
command list.
Why not worktrees?
A worktree per agent is the usual answer, and for fully independent tasks it works. But every worktree is another environment to build (another install, another build cache, another dev server) and isolation just moves the collision to merge time. Those costs grow with the number of agents; the whole point of a shared checkout is paying for the environment once.
| Run fewer agents | Worktree per agent | Quilt | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parallelism | capped low | high | high |
| Setup per agent | none | full install/build/env × N | none (one checkout) |
| See each other's in-flight work | n/a | no | yes |
| Collisions | avoided by hand | surface at merge | prevented, or surfaced live |
| Clean per-agent commits | n/a | after a merge | yes |
Worktrees isolate; they don't coordinate. When agents work the same code at the same time, you usually want them to see each other and account for each other as they go. That is what Quilt does. The two aren't mutually exclusive: worktrees for independent, long-running work, Quilt for agents in the same code at once.
Using it with agents
quilt setup wires the capture hooks and a shared MCP server. On Claude Code the
hooks let agents use the built-in Edit and Write tools normally while Quilt
records each change's author and blocks a write into code another agent holds,
with no protocol for the agent to follow and no setup: each session is named
automatically, or carries its own QUILT_ACTOR for a stable id. For other
runtimes, the same capture and prevention is available as MCP tools, with each
connection named automatically the same way.
See docs/orchestrators.md for Codex, Cursor, Aider, and the difference between process-per-agent and many-agents-in-one-process setups.
Docs
- docs/orchestrators.md: running a fleet of agents.
- docs/reference.md: the full command list, how attribution
works, and the
.quilt/state layout. - bench/: the scenario ladder Quilt is tested against, run with and without Quilt on the same metrics.
Contributing
Contributions are welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.
License
MIT
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.