orgintel
Analyzes Salesforce permission architecture (profiles, permission sets, groups) to support RBAC remediation. It snapshots the permission model into DuckDB and provides tools for diffs, sensitive access detection, and verified decomposition proposals.
README
orgintel
An MCP server that analyzes Salesforce permission architecture — profiles, permission sets, and permission set groups — to support RBAC remediation. It reads an org, snapshots the permission model into a local DuckDB store, and answers questions about it. Phases 1–4 (acquisition, analysis core, eval harness, agent).
Two hard guarantees, both enforced as mechanism rather than policy:
- Read-only. orgintel never issues an insert, update, delete, or metadata deploy
against any org. Enforced by a transport-layer route allowlist (see
clients/transport.py); a non-allowlisted request raises before it is sent. - No personal identifiers persisted. The
userstable has no name, username, or email column — the columns do not exist.soql_querymasks identifier columns in its results. See DESIGN-P1.md §2.7.
Why it's built this way
A mid-size org has ~850k FieldPermissions rows — a raw dump is ~20M tokens, ~100× a
context window. The model never sees raw API output. Every tool returns an
aggregate, a diff, or a bounded slice; the join happens in DuckDB. Every response
carries a budget that discloses truncation and how to narrow.
Setup
Requires uv and the Salesforce CLI (sf).
uv sync
uv run pytest # 51 tests, no org needed
Auth (Phase 1: SFDX token reuse)
orgintel reads the access token from an org you've already authenticated with the Salesforce CLI — zero extra setup. JWT bearer flow is a planned seam, not yet built.
sf org login web --alias my-org # once
sf org list # confirm it's Connected
The subprocess argv is fixed and its output (which contains a live token) is never logged.
Tools
| Tool | What it returns |
|---|---|
snapshot_org(org_alias, scope?) |
Bulk-fetches the permission model into DuckDB. Returns summary stats only — counts, timing, snapshot_id. |
list_snapshots() |
Available snapshots, newest first. |
list_profiles(snapshot_id) |
Profiles by user count: license, perm cardinality, ModifyAllData flag, unassigned count. |
describe_object(org_alias, api_name) |
Live field list with a sensitivity_guess flag (SSN/DOB/account-number/… from config), sensitive fields first. |
permission_diff(snapshot_id, principal_a, principal_b) |
Symmetric difference of two principals. Differing fields grouped by (a_perm, b_perm) signature. The workhorse. |
soql_query(org_alias, query, max_rows=200) |
Read-only SOQL. SELECT-only parser guard, row cap, identifier columns redacted. |
find_sensitive_access(snapshot_id) |
(P2) Every principal granting read/edit on a name-matched sensitive field, with affected user counts resolved through effective permissions. Recall-first. |
verify_decomposition(snapshot_id, proposal) |
(P2) Formal check that a proposed base-profile + permission-set/group refactor leaves every user's effective permissions unchanged. Returns per-user added/removed grants; an uncovered user fails. |
propose_decomposition(snapshot_id, threshold?, target_base_count?) |
(P4) Computes a thin-base + permission-set decomposition (deterministic) and runs it through verify_decomposition before returning. If it doesn't preserve every user's access, you get the failure, not the proposal. Returns placeholder keys + member names + shared grants for the model to name. |
scope defaults to all tables. Apex in SetupEntityAccess is excluded by default
(84% of that table, ~noise for RBAC); pass "setup_entity_access:apex" to include it.
Two P2 functions — effective_permissions (union across profile + permission sets + PSG
components, minus muting) and cluster_profiles (Jaccard clustering of profiles) — are
internal building blocks, not yet exposed as tools. verify_decomposition is the crown
jewel: permission-refactor correctness is formally checkable, so "did the refactor
preserve access" is a boolean, not a judgement call — and propose_decomposition is
gated by it, so an unverifiable proposal is never returned.
Agent (P4)
agent/ is an MCP client that drives these tools via the Anthropic API
(claude-opus-5). The division of labor is the whole point: the tools compute and
verify; the model orchestrates, names, and judges. propose_decomposition returns a
verified structure with placeholder names; the model names each base in the customer's
vocabulary and writes the rationale. The model also judges whether an unmatched field
name looks sensitive (mbr_num__c, dob_enc__c) — the gap P3 measured as evasive recall.
uv sync --extra agent
orgintel-agent "snapshot appfoliosteph, then propose a decomposition" # billable
The model call sits behind an LLM protocol, so the loop, tool bridge, and judge are all
tested with a scripted fake — no API key, no billing. Only orgintel-agent makes real
calls. uv run python -m evals.agent_delta measures the evasive-recall lift the judge
buys (0.0 → 1.0 with the offline stand-in; detectable recall held at 1.0).
Register with Claude Desktop
Add to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"orgintel": {
"command": "uv",
"args": ["run", "orgintel"],
"cwd": "/Users/shaumikpathak/Downloads/MCP Salesforce"
}
}
}
Then in Claude: "Snapshot my-org, then show me the profiles with the most users, then diff the top two."
Eval harness (P3)
The highest-signal artifact in the project: a scoreboard for the deterministic analysis core, built before the agent so it develops against numbers, not vibes.
uv run python -m evals.run # writes evals/REPORT.md + a run to evals/history/
fixtures/generate.py synthesizes org snapshots with planted ground truth
(deterministic given a seed): latent roles, redundant pairs that should collapse,
adversarial "do not consolidate" cases, and sensitive fields — some pattern-detectable,
some named to evade (mbr_num__c, dob_enc__c). The harness scores cluster purity,
sensitive-field recall (detectable target 1.0; evasive recall is the gap the P4 model
must close, measured explicitly), and privilege preservation (verify_decomposition must
certify a ground-truth decomposition and catch a broken one). Each run diffs against the
previous, so a prompt or pattern change that drops recall shows up immediately.
Snapshot store
One DuckDB file, default ~/.orgintel/snapshots.db, override with ORGINTEL_DB. Set it
per client engagement to keep each org's data in its own file. A snapshot holds
principal/object/field metadata and pseudonymous user ids — re-identification
requires authenticated access to the source org. Snapshot files are git-ignored.
Layout
src/orgintel/
clients/ thin async SF wrappers (REST, Bulk 2.0, SFDX auth) — no DB, guarded transport
store/ DuckDB schema (SQL migrations), ingest, queries, snapshot loader — no network
analysis/ pure functions: diff, effective perms, clustering, sensitivity, verify, propose — no I/O
agent/ MCP client + Anthropic-backed model (LLM protocol), tool loop, field judge
config/ sensitivity.yaml (patterns + setup-entity scope)
snapshot.py the acquisition coordinator (auth -> fetch -> ingest)
server.py nine FastMCP tools — thin
fixtures/ deterministic synthetic orgs with planted ground truth (P3)
evals/ scoreboard: run.py (deterministic core) + agent_delta.py (P4 model lift)
See DESIGN-P1.md for the schema rationale and CLAUDE.md for conventions.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.