n8n-workflows-mcp
An MCP server that turns deployed n8n workflows into callable tools for AI agents, enabling discovery and execution of tagged workflows via a standard interface without rewriting integrations.
README
n8n-workflows-mcp
Turn your deployed n8n workflows into tools your AI agents can call — without rewriting anything.
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that exposes the n8n workflows you already have running in production as tools an AI agent can discover and execute. No SDK, no rewriting integrations, no duplicating credentials inside the agent.
This is not the official n8n MCP server. That one lets an agent build workflows through the n8n Workflow SDK. This one runs the workflows you already built — it is the operational complement, not a competitor.

Why
Thousands of teams have n8n automations deployed with real business logic: tested integrations, configured credentials, flows already running in production. AI agents can't use them today. The usual options are to reimplement the integration inside the agent (duplicating both work and secrets) or to manually bridge the chat and the automation by hand.
This server closes that gap: any workflow tagged for exposure becomes callable
through four generic tools (list_workflows, get_workflow_schema,
execute_workflow, get_execution_status) — it does not register a separate
MCP tool per workflow. That gets you three things:
- Reuse — an automation you already validated becomes an agent capability without rewriting a line of it.
- Control and security — the workflow runs on your infrastructure with
your credentials; the agent never sees third-party API keys. The
mcptag is an explicit governance boundary: you expose what you decide, nothing else. - A standard, not a lock-in — because it's MCP, it works with Claude, custom agents, and any current or future MCP client.
Useful if you're an automation consultant adding agents on top of existing n8n stacks, a team that already invested in n8n and wants agentic AI without migrating anything, or a maker wiring personal automations into an agent.
How it works
AI agent (MCP client)
│ stdio (JSON-RPC)
▼
n8n-workflows-mcp ───────────────► n8n REST API (discovery, schema, execution status)
│ GET /workflows, /workflows/:id, /executions/:id
└────────────────────────────► n8n webhook (execution)
POST/GET /webhook/:path
│
▼
your n8n instance
Discovery and execution are opt-in by design: only workflows tagged with a
configured tag (mcp by default) are ever listed, described, or run. Anything
without that tag is invisible to the agent, even if the API key used could
technically reach it.
Quickstart
Requirements
- Node.js >= 22
- An n8n instance reachable over HTTP(S), with the REST API enabled
- An n8n API key (Settings → n8n API → Create an API key)
1. Build the server
git clone https://github.com/NestorPVsf/n8n-workflows-mcp.git
cd n8n-workflows-mcp
npm install
npm run build
2. Tag a workflow in n8n
Open the workflow → Tags → add a tag named mcp (or whatever you set
N8N_MCP_TAG to). Only tagged workflows become visible to the agent.
3. Point your MCP client at it
Claude Desktop / Claude Code config (claude_desktop_config.json or
.mcp.json):
{
"mcpServers": {
"n8n-workflows": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/n8n-workflows-mcp/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"N8N_BASE_URL": "https://your-n8n-instance.example.com",
"N8N_API_KEY": "your-api-key",
"N8N_MCP_TAG": "mcp"
}
}
}
}
Restart the client. The agent now has four tools scoped to whatever you've
tagged mcp.
Configuration
All configuration is via environment variables, read once at startup
(src/config.ts). Missing or invalid required values make the server fail
fast with a clear error instead of starting in a broken state.
| Variable | Required | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
N8N_BASE_URL |
Yes | — | Base URL of your n8n instance, no trailing slash. Must be a valid URL. |
N8N_API_KEY |
Yes* | — | REST API key, sent as X-N8N-API-KEY on every discovery request. Mutually exclusive with N8N_API_KEY_FILE — exactly one is required. |
N8N_API_KEY_FILE |
Yes* | — | Path to a file whose (trimmed) contents are the API key. Mutually exclusive with N8N_API_KEY. |
N8N_MCP_TAG |
No | mcp |
Tag used as the discovery/execution boundary. |
N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_NAME |
No | — | Name of a header sent on every webhook call. Requires a value (below) if set. |
N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_VALUE |
No | — | Value of that header. Requires the name above if set. Mutually exclusive with N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_VALUE_FILE. Leave unset (along with the file variant) to disable. |
N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_VALUE_FILE |
No | — | Path to a file whose (trimmed) contents are the webhook auth header value. Mutually exclusive with N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_VALUE. |
* Exactly one of N8N_API_KEY / N8N_API_KEY_FILE must be set.
The *_FILE variants follow the Docker/Kubernetes secrets convention
(read the secret from a mounted file instead of an env var) and are the
recommended way to configure this server: they keep the actual secret out
of the MCP client's JSON config, which is often stored in plaintext, synced,
or checked into a dotfiles repo. The file is read once at startup, trimmed of
surrounding whitespace, and treated exactly like the direct env var from then
on. On POSIX systems, the server warns on stderr (without failing) if the
file is readable by group or other users, since that undermines the point of
keeping the secret out of the config file.
Tools
| Tool | Arguments | Returns |
|---|---|---|
list_workflows |
none | Array of { id, name, description? } — only workflows tagged with the configured tag. |
get_workflow_schema |
workflowId: string |
{ name, httpMethod, webhookPath, inputSchema, schemaSource: "sticky-note" | "generic", note? } — the webhook trigger details and a best-effort input schema. |
execute_workflow |
workflowId: string, input?: Record<string, unknown> |
{ status, body } — the raw HTTP response from the workflow's webhook. |
get_execution_status |
executionId: string |
{ id, status, startedAt?, stoppedAt? } |
Every call to get_workflow_schema and execute_workflow re-fetches the
workflow and re-checks the tag, so a workflow untagged mid-session stops being
usable immediately — the agent doesn't get to act on a stale, cached
authorization. This isn't perfectly atomic: an in-flight call that already
passed the tag check completes even if the workflow is untagged a moment
later (TOCTOU) — only the next call is guaranteed to see the change.
See Execution semantics below for what
execute_workflow actually guarantees (and doesn't) when a call fails.
Security model
- The tag is the boundary.
list_workflows,get_workflow_schema, andexecute_workflowall filter onN8N_MCP_TAG. This is default-deny: a workflow is invisible to the agent until you explicitly opt it in. - Two separate auth mechanisms, not one.
N8N_API_KEYauthenticates against the n8n REST API for discovery (listing workflows, reading schema, checking execution status).N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_NAME/N8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_VALUEis a separate shared secret sent only on webhook execution calls, verified inside the workflow itself if you choose to check it. Don't conflate the two — a leaked webhook secret does not grant REST API access, and vice versa. - Use a least-privilege API key. Where your n8n instance supports scoped keys or a dedicated service user, prefer that over reusing an administrator's personal API key.
- Prefer the
*_FILEenv vars for secrets.N8N_API_KEY_FILEandN8N_WEBHOOK_AUTH_HEADER_VALUE_FILElet the actual secret live in a file (owned and permissioned like any other credential file) instead of the MCP client's JSON config, which many clients store in plaintext on disk and which is easy to accidentally commit, sync, or screenshot. The server reads the file once at startup and never re-reads it. - The credentials this server manages never pass through the agent.
N8N_API_KEYand the webhook auth header are never included in tool results. This does not extend to whatever a workflow itself returns — if a workflow's webhook response echoes back a secret (by design or by mistake), the agent sees it, becauseexecute_workflowreturns the workflow's raw HTTP response body. Keeping secrets out of webhook responses is the workflow author's responsibility, not this server's.
Execution semantics
execute_workflow delivery is at-least-once, not exactly-once. A
Webhook request timeout after 15 seconds. or Failed to reach webhook: ...
error means the MCP server didn't get a confirmed response — it does not
mean the workflow didn't run. The HTTP request may have reached n8n and
triggered execution before the connection dropped or the client gave up.
There is no idempotency key in v1: retrying a timed-out execute_workflow
call can run the workflow twice. If a workflow has side effects that aren't
safe to duplicate (charging a card, sending an email, creating a record),
either make the workflow idempotent on its own terms (e.g. dedupe on a
request id you pass in input), or don't retry blindly — use
get_execution_status / your own out-of-band signal to check whether the
first attempt actually completed before deciding to retry. This is why
execute_workflow is registered with MCP annotations
destructiveHint: true, idempotentHint: false — a well-behaved client should
already treat it with the same caution as any other non-idempotent write.
Known limitations
- Only active workflows are listed.
list_workflowsasks n8n for active workflows only. Tagging a workflow that is switched off is not enough: n8n only serves the production/webhook/<path>URL for active workflows (inactive ones answer on the test URL, and only while the editor is listening), so an inactive workflow could be listed but never executed. If a workflow you tagged does not show up, check the Active toggle first. - Only webhook-triggered workflows are executable.
get_workflow_schemaandexecute_workflowrequire an8n-nodes-base.webhooktrigger node; workflows started by other triggers (cron, manual, form) will list fine but fail schema/execution with a clear error. This mirrors n8n itself — there is no generic "run any workflow synchronously" API. Disabled webhook nodes are skipped when looking for the trigger; if a workflow somehow has more than one active webhook node, the first one found is used — there's no way to select between them. - Webhook responses must be JSON, text, or empty.
execute_workflowreads the workflow's webhook response according to itsContent-Type: JSON is parsed,text/*is returned as a string, and an empty/204 body becomesnull. Any otherContent-Type(binary, multipart, etc.) fails with an explicit "unsupported Content-Type" error rather than mangling the bytes. - Webhook responses are capped at 2MB. A larger response — whether
declared via
Content-Lengthor discovered while reading the body — fails with an explicit error instead of silently truncating or exhausting memory. - Redirects are never followed. Both the n8n REST API calls and webhook
execution calls use
redirect: "manual"; a 3xx response fails with an explicit error instead of resendingN8N_API_KEYor the webhook auth header to whatever origin theLocationheader points at. - Schema inference is best-effort. If a workflow has a Sticky Note node
whose content is JSON containing
typeorproperties, that's used as the input schema. Otherwise the server falls back to a generic{ type: "object", additionalProperties: true }schema and says so in the response. It never promises strict validation of a workflow's actual inputs. - stdio transport only in v1. No HTTP/SSE transport, no remote MCP client support yet.
- Read + execute only. This server does not create, edit, activate, or deactivate workflows — that's the official n8n MCP server's job.
Development
npm install
npm run typecheck # tsc --noEmit
npm run lint # biome check .
npm test # vitest run
npm run build # tsdown
npm run dev # tsdown --watch
Built with a TDD workflow — tests in test/ are written against each module
before the implementation (src/n8n-client.ts, src/tools/*.ts,
src/server.ts) and mock the n8n HTTP layer rather than hitting a real
instance. See CONTRIBUTING.md for setup details and
conventions, and DECISIONS.md for the reasoning behind the
main design choices.
License
MIT — see LICENSE.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.