memex

memex

A production-grade persistent memory service for AI agents. Agents forget everything between sessions by default — memex fixes that. It stores, retrieves, and ranks conversation memory using semantic search with recency decay, so agents surface what's relevant and recent, not just what's semantically closest.

Category
Visit Server

README

memex

GitHub release Python FastAPI MCP License: MIT ayushagrawal288/memex MCP server

memex MCP server

A production-grade persistent memory service for AI agents. Agents forget everything between sessions by default — memex fixes that. It stores, retrieves, and ranks conversation memory using semantic search with recency decay, so agents surface what's relevant and recent, not just what's semantically closest.

POST /v1/memories          → store a memory, embed it, persist to Postgres
POST /v1/memories/search   → retrieve top-k memories ranked by similarity + recency
DELETE /v1/memories/{id}   → forget a specific memory
GET  /v1/memories/count    → how many memories does this agent/user have
GET  /health               → liveness + DB connectivity check
GET  /metrics              → Prometheus metrics

Architecture

caller (agent / app)
        │
        ▼
  FastAPI (async)
        │
   ┌────┴────┐
   │         │
embeddings  asyncpg pool (min=5, max=20)
(fastembed  │
 ONNX,      ▼
 local)  PostgreSQL 16
           pgvector extension
           ivfflat index (cosine)

Write path: content → fastembed ONNX inference (local, ~12 ms CPU, BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5) → INSERT with 384-dim vector → return memory ID.

Read path: query → embed → pgvector cosine search (top_k × 3 candidates) → re-rank with recency decay in Python → return top_k results with scores.


Design decisions

1. Recency decay on top of semantic search

Pure vector similarity returns the most semantically similar memories, not the most useful ones. A fact from 90 days ago that's a 0.95 similarity match is often less useful than a 0.80 match from yesterday.

Score formula:

score = α × cosine_similarity + (1 − α) × exp(−λ × age_days)

Where λ = ln(2) / half_life_days (default: 30 days, so a 30-day-old memory has 50% recency weight).

α is configurable per request (default 0.7). Task-focused agents use higher α (semantic dominates). Conversational agents use lower α (recency matters more).

2. Fetch 3× candidates, re-rank in Python

The pgvector query returns top_k × 3 candidates sorted by pure similarity. Python re-ranks with the decay formula and slices to top_k. This prevents recency decay from starving high-similarity older memories — they're still in the candidate pool.

At 10× scale (>1M memories per agent): push the scoring into a Postgres function using pg_proc to eliminate the Python re-ranking round-trip.

3. asyncpg + explicit pool sizing over SQLAlchemy async

SQLAlchemy adds ORM overhead on every query. The hot retrieval path — embed, query, re-rank — needs to be tight. asyncpg gives direct control over pool min/max (same instinct as tuning HikariCP in Java). pgvector queries require raw SQL for the <=> operator anyway.

Pool defaults: min=5, max=20. Right-size for a single-instance deployment. Override via DB_MAX_POOL_SIZE env var.

4. Rate limiting in Postgres, not Redis

Sliding window counter via upsert. One fewer dependency. Correct under concurrent requests (transactional upsert). At 10× scale with distributed deployments: replace with Redis INCR + EXPIRE — atomic operations, no lock contention.

5. ivfflat index, not HNSW

ivfflat has lower build cost and lower memory footprint — the right tradeoff at small-to-medium scale (<1M vectors). lists=100 works well up to ~1M rows. At 10× scale: switch to HNSW (m=16, ef_construction=64) for better recall at the cost of higher memory and build time.


Running locally

Prerequisites: Docker and Docker Compose. No API keys required — the entire stack runs locally.

git clone https://github.com/ayushagrawal288/memex
cd memex
docker compose up

The API is live at http://localhost:8000. Interactive docs at http://localhost:8000/docs.


API reference

Store a memory

curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/memories \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "agent_id": "my-agent",
    "user_id": "user-123",
    "content": "User prefers concise responses and dislikes verbose explanations.",
    "memory_type": "semantic",
    "importance": 1.2
  }'
{
  "id": "3fa85f64-5717-4562-b3fc-2c963f66afa6",
  "agent_id": "my-agent",
  "user_id": "user-123",
  "content": "User prefers concise responses and dislikes verbose explanations.",
  "importance": 1.2,
  "memory_type": "semantic",
  "created_at": "2026-05-26T10:30:00Z",
  "score": null
}

Search memories

curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/memories/search \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "agent_id": "my-agent",
    "user_id": "user-123",
    "query": "how does this user like to communicate",
    "top_k": 5,
    "alpha": 0.7
  }'
{
  "results": [
    {
      "id": "3fa85f64-...",
      "content": "User prefers concise responses and dislikes verbose explanations.",
      "memory_type": "semantic",
      "created_at": "2026-05-26T10:30:00Z",
      "score": 0.8921
    }
  ],
  "query": "how does this user like to communicate",
  "total": 1
}

Memory types

Type Use for
episodic Specific events, past conversations
semantic Facts, preferences, general knowledge
procedural Workflows, how-to instructions

Load test results

Run on a MacBook M-series, Docker Desktop, single Postgres instance:

locust -f scripts/load_test.py --host=http://localhost:8000 \
       --headless -u 50 -r 10 -t 60s

Realistic load (50 users, 100–300 ms think time — models actual agent traffic):

Endpoint RPS p50 (ms) p95 (ms) p99 (ms) Error rate
POST /v1/memories (write) 27 160 270 330 0%
POST /v1/memories/search 83 110 200 250 0%
Aggregated 113 120 230 300 0%

Saturation test (500 users, minimal think time — finds the throughput ceiling):

Endpoint RPS (plateau) p50 (ms) p99 (ms) Error rate
POST /v1/memories (write) 28 3,900 6,100 0%
POST /v1/memories/search 91 3,600 5,800 0%
Aggregated ~120 3,700 5,900 0%

Run on MacBook M-series, Docker Desktop (4 CPUs), 4 uvicorn workers, 16 threads/worker.
Embeddings: local ONNX (BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5) — zero external API calls, zero cost.

Why the ceiling is ~120 RPS:
Every write and every search requires one ONNX inference (~10–15 ms on CPU). With 4 Docker CPUs: 4 cores / 12 ms ≈ 333 embeddings/s theoretical max. After Python overhead, DB queries, and asyncio scheduling: ~120 RPS actual.

Path to higher throughput:

Approach Expected gain Complexity
Embedding cache (Redis, key = SHA256 of text) 2–3× (40–60% hit rate on repeated agent queries) Low
Horizontal scaling (N replicas behind a load balancer) N× linear Medium
GPU inference (swap ONNX runtime → CUDA) 10–50× Medium
Voyage-3 API (offload to Anthropic's inference fleet) Scales to thousands of RPS, limited by API quota Low code change

Project structure

memex/
├── app/
│   ├── main.py                  # REST API — FastAPI, lifespan, router registration
│   ├── mcp_server.py            # MCP server — single-worker FastAPI on port 8001
│   ├── core/
│   │   └── config.py            # All settings, loaded from env
│   ├── db/
│   │   └── pool.py              # asyncpg pool, migrations
│   ├── models/
│   │   └── schemas.py           # Pydantic request/response models
│   ├── services/
│   │   ├── embeddings.py        # fastembed ONNX inference (local, zero API calls)
│   │   ├── local_summarizer.py  # Extractive summariser — Jaccard dedup + TF scoring
│   │   ├── memory.py            # Core write/search/scoring logic
│   │   ├── metrics.py           # Prometheus metric definitions
│   │   ├── summarizer.py        # Background summarisation job
│   │   └── rate_limit.py        # Sliding window rate limiter
│   └── api/routes/
│       ├── memories.py          # Memory endpoints
│       ├── health.py            # Health + readiness
│       └── mcp_tools.py         # MCP tool definitions (store, search, delete, count)
├── scripts/
│   └── load_test.py             # Locust load test
├── docker-compose.yml
├── Dockerfile
└── requirements.txt

Observability

docker compose up starts Prometheus and Grafana alongside the API:

Service URL Credentials
REST API docs http://localhost:8000/docs
MCP server http://localhost:8001/mcp/
Prometheus http://localhost:9090
Grafana http://localhost:3000 admin / admin

The Grafana dashboard is provisioned automatically. Panels:

  • HTTP request rate + latency p50/p99 — from prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator
  • Embedding API latency p50/p99 — per-attempt histogram by operation (embed / embed_batch)
  • Memory operations/s — create, search, delete throughput
  • DB pool utilisation — active vs idle connections (update interval: 15 s)
  • Summariser activity — memories condensed per hour, run outcomes
  • Embedding errors/min — by operation and error type

Custom metrics are in app/services/metrics.py and exposed on /metrics alongside the standard FastAPI instrumentator metrics.


MCP endpoint

memex exposes itself as an MCP server so any MCP-aware agent (Claude Desktop, Claude Code, custom agents) can store and retrieve memories without custom HTTP integration.

Transport: Streamable HTTP (MCP 2024-11-05 spec). Single-worker process on port 8001 — session state is in-process, so a separate service avoids sticky-session complexity while keeping the REST API's multi-worker throughput.

Tools:

Tool Description
store_memory Embed + persist a memory (type, importance configurable)
search_memories Semantic + recency ranked retrieval with configurable alpha
delete_memory Forget a specific memory by UUID
count_memories How many memories an agent/user pair has

Connect from Claude Desktop

Add to ~/.config/claude/claude_desktop_config.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "memex": {
      "type": "streamable-http",
      "url": "http://localhost:8001/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

Connect from Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http memex http://localhost:8001/mcp/

Design: why a separate service

The MCP Streamable HTTP transport is session-stateful — initialize, tools/list, and tools/call must all reach the same server process. The REST API runs 4 uvicorn workers with round-robin routing; routing different MCP requests to different workers breaks session state.

Running a dedicated single-worker MCP service on port 8001 avoids sticky-session infrastructure (nginx ip_hash, Redis session store) while keeping the REST API fully multi-worker.


Memory summarisation

Runs as a background asyncio task on a configurable interval (default: every 5 minutes). Finds any (agent_id, user_id) pair where episodic memory count exceeds a threshold, condenses the oldest batch into a single semantic memory, then deletes the originals. Fully local — no LLM API calls.

How it summarises: Pure Python extractive algorithm. Sentences are deduplicated by Jaccard similarity (≥ 0.7 threshold), scored by word frequency (TF), and the top-N are returned in original order. ~1 ms per summarisation, zero dependencies beyond the standard library.

Why episodic-only: Episodic memories are conversation events with natural time-based obsolescence. Semantic and procedural memories encode facts and skills — silently condensing them risks precision loss; they age out via recency decay instead.

Concurrency safety: Uses pg_try_advisory_xact_lock keyed on hashtext(agent_id|user_id). The lock is held only during the DB write transaction, not during the embedding call.

Tune via env vars:

Var Default Description
SUMMARIZATION_ENABLED true Toggle the background job
SUMMARIZATION_THRESHOLD 100 Episodic count to trigger per pair
SUMMARIZATION_BATCH_SIZE 50 Oldest N memories to condense per run
SUMMARIZATION_INTERVAL_SECONDS 300 How often the job wakes up

What's next

  • [x] Memory summarisation — background job to condense old episodic memories (local extractive algorithm, zero API calls) when count exceeds threshold
  • [x] Prometheus + Grafana — p50/p99 latency dashboards, embedding API call duration, pool saturation
  • [x] MCP-compatible endpoint — Streamable HTTP server on port 8001; 4 tools (store, search, delete, count); connects to Claude Desktop and Claude Code
  • [ ] HNSW index option — flag to switch from ivfflat to HNSW for deployments with >1M vectors
  • [ ] Importance-weighted retrieval — factor importance score into ranking formula alongside similarity and recency

Tech stack

Layer Choice Why
API FastAPI + uvicorn Async-first, fast, excellent OpenAPI generation
Embeddings fastembed ONNX (BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5) Local, zero API calls, ~12 ms CPU inference, 384-dim
Database PostgreSQL 16 + pgvector Relational + vector in one system, no extra infra
Vector index ivfflat Lower build cost than HNSW at this scale
Pool asyncpg Direct control, zero ORM overhead
Summariser Pure Python extractive Jaccard dedup + TF scoring, zero ML deps, ~1 ms
Retry tenacity Jitter-based backoff on transient errors
Metrics Prometheus + prometheus-fastapi-instrumentator Standard observability
Load testing Locust Python-native, realistic user simulation

Recommended Servers

playwright-mcp

playwright-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
VeyraX MCP

VeyraX MCP

Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.

Official
Featured
Local
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.

Official
Featured
Python
E2B

E2B

Using MCP to run code via e2b.

Official
Featured
Neon Database

Neon Database

MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases

Official
Featured
Qdrant Server

Qdrant Server

This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.

Official
Featured
Exa Search

Exa Search

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.

Official
Featured