mcp-trust-scanner
Scans MCP tools for trust drift, composition risks, and runtime policy violations, with optional LLM explanations.
README
MCP Trust Proxy
The problem
Most MCP security scanners check a tool's declared name, description, and input schema once - at install/connect time - and never again. That misses the attacks that actually matter: a tool's description silently changing after it's been approved (a "rug pull"), two individually-safe tools that become dangerous when combined (e.g. a file-reader plus a message-sender is an exfiltration path even if neither tool ever changes), and a live call that's malicious in the moment even though the tool's declaration looks perfectly innocent. A one-time static check catches none of these.
How it works - four layers
- Trust scanner (
scanner/scan.py,scanner/hashing.py,scanner/storage.py) - hashes every tool's{name, description, input_schema}and stores it in SQLite. Every subsequent scan compares today's hash against the last trusted one: NEW / OK / CHANGED. A CHANGED tool prints a readable diff - of the description if that's what moved, or of the pretty-printed input schema if the description is identical but the schema still changed underneath it. - Blast-radius composition scoring (
scanner/blast_radius.py) - tags every tool by capability (file_read, file_write, network_egress, credential_access, code_execution, destructive) using whole-word keyword matching, then looks at the union of capabilities across every connected server and flags dangerous combinations - like a file-reader and a message-sender together forming an exfiltration path - even when no single tool's hash has changed. - Runtime policy proxy (
scanner/proxy_server.py,scanner/runtime_policy.py) - a real MCP server that sits in front of the backend servers. Every call is policy-checked before it's forwarded: a read of a sensitive-looking path (.ssh,.env, credentials, private keys) gets WARNed but still allowed through; a message whose body looks like it contains credential material, or whose recipient isn't on an allowlist, gets BLOCKed outright - the backend never sees it. - Optional LLM explain layer (
scanner/incident_explainer.py) - only runs on WARN/BLOCK verdicts, and only ifANTHROPIC_API_KEYis set. It turns an already-made rule-based verdict into one plain-English sentence for a human reading the log. It never makes the ALLOW/WARN/BLOCK decision - that stays fully deterministic. No key set -> this layer is skipped instantly, no network call attempted, and the log just shows the rule-based reason instead.
Quickstart
python3 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate # Windows: venv\Scripts\activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
python -m scanner.scan # baseline every tool, flag drift + risky combos
python run_live_demo.py # fire real calls through the proxy: ALLOW / WARN / BLOCK
python -m scanner.report --open # generate + open the audit dashboard
First run of scanner.scan against any server: everything comes back NEW
(nothing trusted yet). Every run after that: tools are compared against the
stored baseline.
Demo the rug-pull attack
python toy_servers/mutate_demo.py # silently poisons send-message-server
python -m scanner.scan # catches it, shows the diff
python toy_servers/mutate_demo.py --undo # restore clean state
What's in here
toy_servers/- three minimal MCP servers (weather, file-reader, send-message) standing in for real ones. Pointscanner/config.pyat real MCP servers (filesystem, Slack, whatever Cursor is connected to) when you're ready - same interface, nothing else changes.scanner/- the actual product: trust scanner, blast-radius scorer, runtime policy proxy, and the optional LLM explain layer.test_core.py- plain-assert smoke tests (no pytest) for the deterministic core:python test_core.py.trust_store.db- created on first run. Delete it to reset the baseline.
Known limitations
test_core.pycovers basic smoke checks (hash determinism/change detection, one capability tag, one policy verdict) - it is not a full test suite and doesn't cover every rule or edge case.- Blast-radius tagging and runtime policy checks are keyword/pattern-based (word-boundary regex), not semantic. They're fast, deterministic, and auditable, but a sufficiently reworded description or argument can still slip past them - this is a v1 scope cut, not a claim of full coverage.
proxy_server.py's exposed tool schemas are hand-maintained to match the real backend servers, not fetched from them dynamically. If a backend tool's signature changes, the proxy needs a manual update to match - it doesn't automatically mirror backend drift into its own declared schema.- The LLM explain layer only visibly does anything if
ANTHROPIC_API_KEYis set before running the demo; without it, WARN/BLOCK log entries show the same rule-based reason with or without that layer. - Only watches tool definitions (name/description/schema) and specific runtime calls matched by the two policy rules - a server that returns injected instructions in a response, or a malicious call that doesn't match either rule pattern, won't be caught by this version.
- Single-machine trust store (SQLite), not shared across a team.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.