mcp-slim-guard

mcp-slim-guard

Lightweight MCP security proxy — compression (up to 86%) + SSRF protection + allow/deny + audit + rate limiting + injection detection

Category
Visit Server

README


type: Readme title: mcp-slim-guard timestamp: "2026-07-23T18:00:00+08:00" description: Lightweight MCP security proxy — compression (up to 86%) + SSRF protection + allow/deny + audit + rate limiting + injection detection tags:

  • mcp-slim-guard
  • readme
  • mcp
  • security
  • compression

<p align="center"> <a href="./README_CN.md">中文文档</a> · <strong>English</strong> </p>

<h1 align="center">🛡️ mcp-slim-guard</h1>

<p align="center"> <b>One proxy. Two superpowers: compression + security.</b> </p>

<p align="center"> <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/mcp-slim-guard"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/mcp-slim-guard" alt="npm version"></a> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/node-%3E%3D18-brightgreen" alt="Node >=18"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/tests-402%20passed-green" alt="402 tests"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/compression-up%20to%2086%25-blue" alt="86% compression"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/dependencies-5%20prod-lightgrey" alt="5 deps"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/l/mcp-slim-guard" alt="MIT"> </p>

<br>

mcp-slim-guard sits between your AI agent and MCP servers, transparently adding schema compression (5 levels, up to 86% token reduction) and security policies (SSRF protection, tool allow/deny, injection detection, rate limiting, audit logging).

graph LR
    A[AI Agent] --> B[mcp-slim-guard]
    B --> C[Compression Pipeline]
    B --> D[Security Pipeline]
    C --> E[MCP Server 1]
    C --> F[MCP Server N]
    D --> E
    D --> F
    style B fill:#4a90d9,color:#fff
    style C fill:#e6f3ff
    style D fill:#ffe6e6

Why mcp-slim-guard?

Problem Impact How mcp-slim-guard solves it
Context wasted Tool schemas eat 60-86% of your context window 5 compression levels, lazy loading, request cache
No access control Any agent calls any tool with any args Glob-based allow/deny, fail-closed by default
SSRF Tool params inject internal network requests IP blacklist + domain whitelist
Prompt injection Malicious params execute shell/SQL 17 heuristic patterns, 3 sensitivity levels
Abuse Unthrottled tool calls flood upstream Token bucket rate limiter (per-tool configurable)
No audit trail No record of who called what Structured JSON audit log with rotation + gzip

Only mcp-slim-guard combines compression AND security in a single proxy.
Other tools compress schemas but don't protect you. Security proxies don't save you tokens.


Quick Start

# Install
npm install -g mcp-slim-guard

# Auto-discover MCP servers from your .mcp.json
cd your-project/
mcp-slim-guard init

# Dry-run policies to check for false positives
mcp-slim-guard validate

# Start the proxy
mcp-slim-guard start

Your agent now connects to mcp-slim-guard instead of the original servers. That's it.

MCP servers are auto-discovered from .mcp.json, mcp.json, or claude_desktop_config.json.

Generated mcp-slim-guard.yml

tools:
  allow: ["search_*", "read_*"] # only allow search/read tools
  deny: ["*_delete_*", "*_admin_*"] # block dangerous ops
ssrf:
  mode: block
  block_private_ips: true
  allow_domains: ["*.github.com"]
rate_limit:
  default: 60/min # per-tool rate limit
injection_detection:
  enabled: true
  mode: block
  sensitivity: medium
compressor:
  enabled: true
  level: light # 5 levels: off/light/normal/extreme/maximum
cache:
  enabled: false # TTL+LRU read-only response cache
audit:
  output: file # structured JSON audit log
  maxSize: 10MB
  maxFiles: 5

Features

🗜️ Schema Compression — Reclaim Your Context Window

Level Strategy Tokens (14 tools) Savings When to use
off Passthrough 1,736 — < 5 tools, or testing
light 3 wrapper tools (on-demand schema) 300 -83% ⭐ Default. Best balance for most users
normal 2 wrapper tools (no list_tools) 245 -86% 30+ tools, strong LLMs
extreme In-place: strip property descriptions 1,361 -22% Few tools with complex schemas (10+ params)
maximum In-place: signature only, empty properties 1,294 -25% Very large individual schemas
lazy Budget preload + on-demand schema 1,644 -5% 30+ tools, most used only occasionally

Why the big gap? light/normal replace all tools with 2-3 wrapper tools (mcp__invoke_tool, mcp__get_tool_schema). The LLM fetches schemas on demand. extreme/maximum keep all tools and only compress each schema in place — savings depend on schema complexity.

Real-world cost impact

Setup Tokens/call Monthly cost (DeepSeek V4)
Without compression 1,736 ~$52 (10K calls)
With light 300 ~$9 (-83%)

Accuracy verified

Benchmarked against DeepSeek V4 Flash across 12 scenarios × 5 levels × 3 runs = 180 API calls.
Run it yourself →

🛡️ Security Pipeline — Defense in Depth

Every tool call runs through a serial pipeline. First rejection stops execution:

Agent Request
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│  1. Allow/Deny  │  ← Glob pattern matching. Fail-closed.
│  (Whitelist)    │
└────────┬────────┘
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│  2. SSRF Shield │  ← IP blacklist + domain whitelist.
│                  │     Blocks 10.*, 192.168.*, 169.254.*
└────────┬────────┘
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│  3. Injection   │  ← 17 heuristic patterns:
│     Detection   │     Shell/SQL/NoSQL/Prompt injection
└────────┬────────┘
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│  4. Rate Limit  │  ← Token bucket. Per-tool or global.
│                  │     Default: 60 req/min/tool
└────────┬────────┘
         ▼
┌─────────────────┐
│  5. Audit Log   │  ← Structured JSON. Rotate + compress.
│                  │     Every decision recorded.
└────────┬────────┘
         ▼
   Upstream MCP Server

🔄 Additional Capabilities

Feature Description
Multi-server routing One proxy, multiple upstream MCP servers. Tool names are prefixed ({server}_{tool}) for automatic routing.
Hot reload kill -HUP <pid> — zero-downtime config reload. All fields hot-swappable.
Request cache TTL+LRU in-memory cache for read-only tool results. Per-tool stats.
Streamable HTTP mcp-slim-guard start --http --port 3000 — works as a remote MCP endpoint.
STDIO mode Default. Transparent drop-in for local agents.

How It Works

sequenceDiagram
    participant LLM as AI Agent
    participant MM as mcp-slim-guard
    participant US as Upstream MCP Server

    LLM->>MM: tools/list
    Note over MM: Compression pipeline<br/>filters + transforms tools
    MM-->>LLM: compressed tool list (light: 3 wrappers)

    LLM->>MM: mcp__get_tool_schema("search")
    MM-->>LLM: full schema for "search"

    LLM->>MM: mcp__invoke_tool("search", {q: "..."})
    Note over MM: Security pipeline<br/>whitelist → ssrf → injection → ratelimit
    MM->>US: forward call
    US-->>MM: result
    Note over MM: Audit log entry
    MM-->>LLM: result

CLI Reference

Command Description
mcp-slim-guard init Auto-discover .mcp.json, generate mcp-slim-guard.yml
mcp-slim-guard validate Dry-run policies, show allow/deny for each tool
mcp-slim-guard start Start proxy (STDIO mode)
mcp-slim-guard start --http --port 3000 Start proxy (HTTP mode)
mcp-slim-guard status Show config summary + policy overview
mcp-slim-guard doctor Diagnose upstream server connectivity
mcp-slim-guard audit View audit log
mcp-slim-guard uninit Remove mcp-slim-guard.yml and roll back

Benchmarks

All benchmarks use real MCP server tool schemas (filesystem server, 14 tools) with tiktoken (gpt-4o encoding).
Run them yourself: npm run bench

Token Savings

Level Tokens Reduction
off 1,736 baseline
light 300 -83%
normal 245 -86%
extreme 1,361 -22%
maximum 1,294 -25%
lazy 1,644 -5%

Latency Overhead

Policy pipeline:      ~2ms/call  (whitelist → ssrf → injection → ratelimit)
Compression (light):  <0.05ms
Cache hit:            0.01ms

Accuracy (DeepSeek V4 Flash)

12 scenarios × 5 levels × 3 runs = 180 API calls. Scenarios include 4 fuzzy-name tests (read vs search, list vs tree).

Level Accuracy Notes
off 100% Baseline
light ✅ (on-demand) Wrapper mode uses extra round-trip
normal ✅ (on-demand) Same as light

Comparison

Feature mcp-slim-guard slim-mcp mcp-compressor mcp-guardian
Schema compression ✅ 5 levels, -86% ✅ 5 levels, -77% ✅ ❌
Accuracy validation ✅ 180 API calls ✅ 120 API calls ❌ —
Request cache ✅ TTL+LRU ❌ ❌ ❌
Tool allow/deny ✅ Glob-based ❌ ❌ ✅
SSRF protection ✅ IP + domain ❌ ❌ ✅
Injection detection ✅ 17 patterns ❌ ❌ ✅
Rate limiting ✅ Token bucket ❌ ❌ ✅
Audit log ✅ JSON, rotation ❌ ❌ ✅
Hot reload ✅ SIGHUP ❌ ❌ ❌
Multi-server routing ✅ Prefix auto-route ❌ ❌ ❌
HTTP transport ✅ Streamable HTTP ❌ ✅ ❌
Compression + Security ✅ One proxy ❌ Compression only ❌ Compression only ❌ Security only

Requirements

  • Node.js >= 18
  • Only 5 production dependencies (MCP SDK, commander, js-yaml, micromatch, pino)

Docker

docker build -t mcp-slim-guard .
docker run -i --rm -v $(pwd)/mcp-slim-guard.yml:/app/mcp-slim-guard.yml mcp-slim-guard start

License

MIT

Recommended Servers

playwright-mcp

playwright-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
VeyraX MCP

VeyraX MCP

Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.

Official
Featured
Local
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.

Official
Featured
Python
E2B

E2B

Using MCP to run code via e2b.

Official
Featured
Neon Database

Neon Database

MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases

Official
Featured
Exa Search

Exa Search

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.

Official
Featured
Qdrant Server

Qdrant Server

This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.

Official
Featured