mcp-server-starter
This MCP server starter template enables developers to quickly build production-ready MCP servers with Streamable HTTP, stateless design, and OAuth 2.1 authorization. It provides a structured, capability-based architecture with Postgres audit logging and centralized scope enforcement.
README
mcp-server-starter
A production starter template for building MCP servers — the kind you fork once per server and ship. Single container, Streamable HTTP, stateless, OAuth 2.1 resource server, Postgres audit trail.
Sibling to agent-starter, and deliberately shares
its conventions: uv, folder-based autodiscovery, scopes as the one authorisation model, a
Makefile with a make.ps1 shim, and AGENTS.md as the contract.
What this is not
An MCP server owns neither a model nor a conversation — the client's model decides what to call. So there is no agent runtime, no turn loop and no conversation store here. What gets persisted is a tool-call audit trail: who called what, with which arguments, how long it took, what was denied and what failed.
Protocol revision
Built for MCP revision 2026-07-28, which is the largest change since launch:
- Stateless core. No
initializehandshake, noMcp-Session-Id. Client info, capabilities and protocol version travel in_metaon every request. Any request can land on any replica: no sticky routing, no shared session store. server/discoverreplaces the handshake for version and capability negotiation.CacheableResult— every list result carriesttlMsandcacheScope.subscriptions/listenreplaces the HTTP GET endpoint andresources/subscribe.- Roots, Sampling and Logging are deprecated. Nothing here builds on them.
- Resource-not-found moved from
-32002to-32602; several new codes were renumbered into the-32020+ range.
Quick start
make up
Everything in Docker: Postgres, migrations, a canned stub for the catalog upstream, then the
server. Point a client at http://localhost:8080/mcp.
The stub (devtools/fake_upstream.py) exists so the example tools actually return data on the
first run. Without it they answer "The catalog service could not be reached" — correct
behaviour against an upstream you have not configured, and impossible to tell apart from a
broken checkout. Delete it and its compose service when you point the fork at a real API.
If port 8080 or 5432 is taken — on Windows a system service often owns 8080 — set
APP_HOST_PORT / POSTGRES_HOST_PORT in .env rather than fighting it.
For the fast loop — Postgres in Docker, server on your machine with a real debugger:
make dev
On Windows, where make is usually not on PATH:
.\make.ps1 up
Trying it
The local test client is the fastest way to see scope filtering work. It can change the presented identity and scopes mid-session, which is the thing that is otherwise hard to test:
make client
mcp> scopes catalog.read
mcp> tools
catalog_get_item catalog.read
catalog_search catalog.read
whoami -
mcp> scopes catalog.read catalog.write
mcp> tools
catalog_archive_item catalog.write
catalog_get_item catalog.read
catalog_search catalog.read
whoami -
mcp> call whoami
mcp> call catalog_search query=widget
Adding a capability
Create src/app/capabilities/<name>/ with an __init__.py exporting CAPABILITY. Nothing
needs registering — discovery picks it up, so two people adding a capability in the same sprint
do not collide in a shared list.
# src/app/capabilities/orders/tools.py
class LookupParams(BaseModel):
order_id: str = Field(description="The order identifier.")
@tool(description="Look up an order by id.", scopes={"orders.read"}, upstream="orders")
async def lookup_order(ctx: ToolContext, params: LookupParams) -> str:
data = await ctx.http("orders").get_json(f"/orders/{params.order_id}")
return format_order(data)
# src/app/capabilities/orders/__init__.py
CAPABILITY = capability("orders", "Read and amend customer orders.", tools=(lookup_order,))
The scope you declared is now enforced centrally, filtered out of tools/list for callers who
lack it, and advertised in the server's Protected Resource Metadata. Copy
src/app/capabilities/catalog/ as the reference shape.
Authorization
This server is an OAuth 2.1 Resource Server. It validates tokens; it does not issue them.
- Protected Resource Metadata at
/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource<path>advertising the authorization server(s) and every scope any capability declares. WWW-Authenticateon 401 and 403, carrying bothresource_metadata(where to authenticate) andscope(what to ask for). External clients need no out-of-band config.- Audience-bound validation. A token not issued for this resource is rejected. This is confused-deputy prevention and it is the whole point.
- Step-up authorization. A call to a tool the caller's scopes do not cover answers
403 insufficient_scopewith the complete missing set, so a client can re-authorize once rather than once per scope.
Configure against any OIDC provider by setting AUTH__JWKS_URL, AUTH__ISSUER and
AUTH__RESOURCE_URL — Entra ID, Auth0, Okta and Keycloak all work without code changes.
Client registration is not implemented here and cannot be. Dynamic Client Registration and
Client ID Metadata Documents are authorization-server endpoints; a resource server never sees a
registration request. See docs/authorization.md for how the pieces fit.
Deployment
There is none in this repository, deliberately. The container is the deliverable; how it
reaches an environment depends on patterns this template cannot guess. What it does specify is
what any deployment must satisfy — migration ordering, statelessness, probe semantics, the
resource URL rule — under "Deployment contract" in AGENTS.md. Hand that section to
whoever owns your platform.
Documentation
AGENTS.md— the contract: commands, layout, rules, deployment requirements, known gaps. Read this first if you are changing the repository.docs/authorization.md— pointing the server at an authorization server, and what each provider does differently.
Verification status
What was checked by running it, and what was not, is recorded honestly in AGENTS.md under
"Verification status". The image builds and runs locally; it has never been deployed, and
integration with a real identity provider is unverified.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.