IBAC FastMCP Demo
An MCP server that showcases intent-based access control and ReBAC with OpenFGA, providing team and salary listing tools protected by semantic and deterministic gates.
README
IBAC demo -- MCP tools behind an intent gate and an OpenFGA gate
A teaching demo for the DevOpsDays 2026 talk "ReBAC with OpenFGA". An MCP
server exposes two tools, list_team and list_salaries (the slide deck
writes them as list-team / list-salaries; same things, fake data). Every
call has to get past two gates:
request (x-api-key, x-user-intent)
-> identity extraction naive, on purpose
-> Gate 1 IntentGate does this call serve what the human asked for?
-> Gate 2 FgaGate does a tuple grant can_use on this tool?
-> tool handler
Gate 1 is semantic and probabilistic, Gate 2 deterministic. The order matters: an agent that legitimately holds a permission can still be stopped at Gate 1 when something talks it into using that permission off-task.
Run it
Pre-pull once, on a network that likes you:
docker pull openfga/openfga python:3.12-slim
Then:
make up # build the image, start OpenFGA
make init # create the store, start the server
make demo # the acceptance table
make attack # the money shot
make help lists the rest. Everything runs in containers -- there is no second
way to run this.
Demo it with a real agent
opencode.json points opencode at the server as an MCP
client, once per persona -- each entry pins a different x-api-key and
x-user-intent, so the agent picks a caller by picking a toolset:
| entry | identity | stated intent |
|---|---|---|
ceo |
ceo-bot-key | show me the team roster |
ceo-payroll |
ceo-bot-key | show me executive salaries |
stranger |
random-stranger | show me the team roster |
magma |
magma-grunt-01 | show me the team roster and the salaries |
aqua |
archie | salary review for finance |
opencode run "use the ceo tools to list the team" # allowed
opencode run "use the ceo tools to list their salaries" # blocked at gate 1
That config also denies the agent bash and edit, which is not cosmetic. Run
it without those denials and a blocked agent will rewrite x-user-intent in
the config and call the server with curl instead -- observed, not hypothetical.
The intent header is self-asserted, exactly like the API key. Gate 1 defends
against an agent that is manipulated; it does not defend against an agent
that is itself adversarial.
The storyline
| stage | command | what changes | the beat in the talk |
|---|---|---|---|
| V0 | make init |
model_v0 + 2 tuples | "We're done adding code." One agent, two tools, done. |
| V1 | make magma |
model_v1 + 13 tuples (1 userset + 12 members) | Magma shows up with twelve agents. One tuple grants the whole org list_team, twelve put the grunts in the org. |
| V2 | make aqua |
3 tuples, model untouched | Aqua shows up. No schema change needed -- the model already said what it needed to say. |
The authorization model is written exactly twice in the whole story and never again. OpenFGA keeps both versions in the store.
models/ holds each version twice: .fga is the DSL the slides show, .json
is what the API accepts and what setup_fga.py sends. They are equivalent --
fga model transform --file models/model_v1.fga reproduces the JSON.
make explain shows the difference between a model and a tuple on a throwaway
store: the same userset tuple rejected under model_v0 and accepted under
model_v1, and can_use answering checks while never being stored.
V1 writes zero tuples for list_salaries. Nobody wrote a deny rule, and
the twelve Magma agents still cannot read salaries. That is default-deny doing
the work.
Scenario 7 is the point of the demo. ceo-bot-key genuinely holds
can_use on list_salaries -- scenario 2 proves it. Ask it for the team
roster, then make it reach for salaries anyway:
$ make attack
BLOCKED at gate 1 (intent)
403 intent mismatch: tool list_salaries does not serve stated intent: 'show me the team roster'
Permissions alone would have allowed that call. Intent is what caught it.
Gate 1's judge is a keyword map by default, so the demo has no network
dependency. INTENT_BACKEND=anthropic|ollama swaps in a real model, and both
fail closed. See .env.example.
Verified against fastmcp 3.4.5, openfga-sdk 0.10.4, OpenFGA 1.18.1, Python 3.12, Docker 29.1.3 / Compose 2.40.3 on Ubuntu 24.04.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.