email-intelligence-mcp

email-intelligence-mcp

An MCP server that provides email verification, bulk list cleaning, and signup risk assessment tools. It exposes three typed tools for agents: verify_email, clean_email_list, and assess_signup_risk, with real DNS MX checks and disposable domain detection.

Category
Visit Server

README

InboxValid MCP Prototype

A lightweight, MCP-compatible email intelligence server inspired by InboxValid's real-time verification workflow. It exposes three discoverable tools that an AI agent or LLM client can call as structured functions:

Tool Layer Purpose
verify_email Validation Real-time single-address verification (syntax, disposable, MX).
clean_email_list Hygiene Bulk dedupe + verification with summary statistics.
assess_signup_risk Intelligence Onboarding / fraud decision built on the verification signals.

All three share a single validation engine (verify_email) — the hygiene and risk tools reuse it rather than re-implementing checks.

                verify_email()          <- core validation engine
                     ^  ^
         ┌───────────┘  └───────────┐
 clean_email_list()          assess_signup_risk()

Features

  • Email syntax validation (normalize + regex)
  • Disposable / throwaway domain detection
  • Real DNS MX lookup via dnspython (with timeout + graceful failure)
  • Structured, risk-oriented responses (status, reason, risk_score, checks)
  • MCP tool exposure so agents can discover and invoke verification as a typed tool
  • Single-email verification — verify_email
  • Bulk list cleaning + dedupe — clean_email_list
  • Signup risk scoring + decision — assess_signup_risk

Project layout

tvaram_mcp/
├── server.py              # MCP server; registers the three tools
├── verifier.py            # core engine: verify_email + clean_email_list
├── disposable_domains.py  # curated disposable-domain set
├── risk_engine.py         # assess_signup_risk heuristics
├── demo.py                # runs all three tools and prints results
├── test_verifier.py       # unit tests (DNS mocked; runs offline)
├── requirements.txt
└── screenshots/           # demo captures (see "Demo" below)

Running locally

Requires Python 3.11+.

pip install -r requirements.txt
python server.py            # starts the MCP server over stdio

To see all three tools run without an MCP client (quickest way to review output):

python demo.py

To explore the tools interactively in the MCP Inspector:

mcp dev server.py

Tests

python -m unittest        # or: python -m pytest

Tests mock the DNS lookup, so they run offline and cover the deterministic logic (syntax, disposable detection, normalization, dedupe, and risk scoring).

Using it from an MCP client (e.g. Claude Desktop)

Add an entry to the client's MCP config (claude_desktop_config.json), pointing at this folder:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "inboxvalid": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["D:/assignments/context/tvaram_mcp/server.py"]
    }
  }
}

Restart the client and the three tools appear in tool discovery.


Example invocations

verify_email("founder@gmail.com")

{
  "email": "founder@gmail.com",
  "status": "valid",
  "reason": "mx_record_found",
  "risk_score": 0.08,
  "checks": { "syntax": true, "disposable": false, "mx": true }
}

clean_email_list(["founder@gmail.com", "admin@tempmail.com", "bad-email", "founder@gmail.com"])

{
  "summary": { "total": 4, "valid": 1, "risky": 1, "invalid": 1, "duplicates_removed": 1 },
  "cleaned_list": ["founder@gmail.com"],
  "rejected": [
    { "email": "admin@tempmail.com", "reason": "disposable_domain" },
    { "email": "bad-email", "reason": "invalid_syntax" }
  ]
}

assess_signup_risk("admin@tempmail.com")

{
  "email": "admin@tempmail.com",
  "decision": "manual_review",
  "risk_score": 0.7,
  "signals": {
    "valid_syntax": true,
    "disposable_domain": true,
    "role_based_local_part": true,
    "suspicious_local_part": false,
    "mx_present": false
  },
  "recommendation": "Allow signup but flag for manual review or require email verification before activating the account."
}

Design decisions

  • invalid vs risky vs valid. Email verification is probabilistic, so status is three-way. Bad syntax is invalid — it can never be a real address. A disposable domain or a missing MX record is risky — the address is well-formed and mail might still deliver, so we flag rather than reject.
  • Syntax failures are invalid. A malformed string is a hard, deterministic reject; no network call needed.
  • Disposable domains are risky. They are syntactically valid burner addresses — low trust, but not impossible — so they warrant a flag, not a hard rejection.
  • MX lookup is real, and short-circuited. We perform an actual DNS MX query (the strongest cheap signal that a domain can receive mail) with a 5-second timeout; any DNS failure is treated as "no deliverable server." The pipeline stops at the first failing check so reason always names the real problem.
  • Bulk cleaning reuses the core engine. clean_email_list dedupes on the normalized address and calls verify_email per unique address — no duplicated validation logic.
  • Signup risk is intentionally heuristic. assess_signup_risk layers simple, additive, deterministic weights (role-based, suspicious pattern, disposable, missing MX) on top of the verification signals and maps the score to a decision. It is explainable by design, not a black-box model.
  • SMTP mailbox verification is intentionally omitted. Live SMTP probing (RCPT TO) is slow, frequently blocked/greylisted, and can harm sender reputation — a poor fit for a fast, safe tool. MX + heuristics give most of the signal without those costs.

Error handling & retry/backoff thinking

  • DNS is the only external dependency. verify_email never raises on DNS problems: NXDOMAIN, NoAnswer, NoNameservers, and timeouts all resolve to a clean mx=False / risky outcome, so a transient failure degrades gracefully instead of crashing the tool.
  • The resolver uses a bounded timeout/lifetime (5s) so a slow domain can't hang an agent.
  • Retries are deliberately left out of this prototype to keep behaviour predictable. In production the right place for retry-with-exponential-backoff (plus jitter) is around the DNS call, paired with a short-TTL cache so repeated lookups of the same domain don't re-query. See Future Improvements.

Future improvements

Signals a production, InboxValid-scale platform would add:

  • SMTP mailbox existence verification (RCPT TO probing)
  • Catch-all domain detection
  • Spam-trap detection
  • Richer role-account and disposable-domain lists (regularly updated)
  • Async / batched verification for large lists
  • Result caching (short-TTL per domain) and retry-with-backoff on DNS
  • Rate limiting and per-client quotas

Demo

Screenshots of the tools running in an MCP client live in screenshots/:

  • tool-discovery.png — the three tools listed by the client
  • verify-example.png — a verify_email call and response
  • clean-list-example.png — a clean_email_list call and response
  • signup-risk-example.png — an assess_signup_risk call and response

Recommended Servers

playwright-mcp

playwright-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
VeyraX MCP

VeyraX MCP

Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.

Official
Featured
Local
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.

Official
Featured
Python
E2B

E2B

Using MCP to run code via e2b.

Official
Featured
Neon Database

Neon Database

MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases

Official
Featured
Exa Search

Exa Search

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.

Official
Featured
Qdrant Server

Qdrant Server

This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.

Official
Featured