datadiffer
Enables AI agents to compare database tables using read-only tools, with credentials managed locally and never exposed to the model.
README
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.gauthierpiarrette/datadiffer -->
datadiffer
Diff two tables. See what changed, and which slice of your data it's concentrated in.
98.6% of modified rows have country = 'DE' (8.87x over-represented)
datadiffer compares two tables (dev vs. prod, PR vs. main, source vs.
destination) and tells you what changed and where it's concentrated: rows
added / removed / modified, per-column change rates, and segment attribution.
Built for the era when agents write your pipelines and someone has to check their work. A maintained, MIT-licensed successor to the archived data-diff.
Try it in 60 seconds
No credentials, no config, no account. It generates its own data:
uvx datadiffer demo

datadiffer-demo/orders_prod.parquet vs datadiffer-demo/orders_dev.parquet
key: order_id (inferred from *_id naming)
rows: +800 added -250 removed ~432 modified 49318 unchanged
┏━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃column ┃ changed rows ┃ % of matched┃
┡━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│amount │ 432 │ 0.87%│
└───────┴──────────────┴─────────────┘
-> 98.6% of modified rows have country = 'DE' (8.87x over-represented)
93.2% of added rows have plan = NULL (63.19x over-represented)
sample changes:
[order_id=0] amount: 5.0 -> 7.1
[order_id=1] amount: 6.37 -> 6.38
[order_id=117] amount: 32.4 -> 34.5
[order_id=234] amount: 59.8 -> 61.9
[order_id=351] amount: 87.2 -> 89.3
DIFF FOUND
That last block is the point. A diff tells you 432 rows changed; datadiffer tells you they're almost all German orders, which is the difference between "something moved" and "the VAT change landed."
Install
pip install datadiffer # local files: Parquet, CSV, DuckDB
pip install 'datadiffer[snowflake]' # + Snowflake
pip install 'datadiffer[postgres]' # + Postgres
pip install 'datadiffer[mcp]' # + MCP server for AI agents
Use it
# local files
datadiffer diff prod.parquet dev.parquet
# DuckDB
datadiffer diff prod.duckdb:orders dev.duckdb:orders
# Postgres (attached read-only)
datadiffer diff orders orders_v2 --source "postgresql://user@host:5432/db"
# Snowflake, or anything in datadiffer.toml (run `datadiffer init` first)
datadiffer diff wh::analytics.orders wh::analytics_dev.orders
# cross-source: warehouse vs. a local file
datadiffer diff wh::orders orders_snapshot.parquet
# machine-readable, for scripts and CI
datadiffer diff a.parquet b.parquet --format json
Exit codes follow the GNU diff convention: 0 no differences, 1 differences found, 2 operational error.
Useful flags: --key (inferred when omitted), --where, --columns /
--exclude-columns, --sample-limit, --no-attribution, -q.
In your pull requests
datadiffer-action posts the report as a sticky PR comment:
datadiffer:
ANALYTICS.ORDERSvsANALYTICS_PR_482.ORDERS: differences found ❌+800 added · −250 removed · ~432 modified · 49,318 unchanged (2.96% of base rows affected) Policy: max-changed-rows-pct exceeded: 2.96% > 0.5%
Column Changed rows % of matched amount432 0.87% Where it's concentrated: 98.6% of modified rows have
country = 'DE'(8.87× over-represented) 93.2% of added rows haveplan = NULL(63.19× over-represented)
- uses: gauthierpiarrette/datadiffer-action@v1
with:
config: datadiffer.toml # holds the warehouse connection
table-a: wh::ANALYTICS.ORDERS
schema-map: "ANALYTICS=ANALYTICS_PR_${PR_NUMBER}"
max-changed-rows-pct: "0.5"
env:
SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY: ${{ secrets.SNOWFLAKE_PRIVATE_KEY }}
Running dbt? docs/dbt-ci.md turns dbt ls --select state:modified into one diff per changed model, each with its own comment.
For AI agents (MCP)
Let a coding agent verify its own data changes:
datadiffer init # scaffold datadiffer.toml, then add the server to your client
{ "mcpServers": { "datadiffer": { "command": "datadiffer", "args": ["mcp"] } } }
Any MCP client works. datadiffer init prints the server entry to paste,
including a uvx form for clients that prefer no global install.
Four read-only tools: list_connections, schema_diff, diff_summary
(cheap preflight), diff_tables (full report). Credentials never pass
through the model. Tools take connection names from your local
datadiffer.toml, never DSNs. Over-cap requests come back as structured
refusals with a remedy, so the agent can self-correct instead of failing.
What makes it different
Most diff tools answer whether two tables match. datadiffer answers what changed and where: which columns moved, and which slice of the data the change is concentrated in.
| Tool | Use it instead when |
|---|---|
| Datafold | You need billion-row cross-database reconciliation, a collaboration UI, lineage/impact analysis, and a support contract. |
SQLMesh table_diff |
You already run SQLMesh and diff within a single gateway (cross-database diffing is a Tobiko Cloud feature). |
| Recce | You want a dbt-native PR review UI and your whole workflow is dbt. |
| Google DVT | You're validating a migration across 17 warehouse types and want pass/fail validation with YAML configs. |
| datacompy | You're comparing two pandas/Spark/Polars DataFrames inside one process. |
datadiffer is for the case in between: one command, no platform, works from your terminal, your CI, or your agent, and it explains itself.
Migrating from data-diff / reladiff
Same job, different flags:
| data-diff / reladiff | datadiffer |
|---|---|
data-diff DB1 table1 DB2 table2 |
datadiffer diff <a> <b> (locators or --source/--target) |
-k, --key-columns |
--key (repeatable, or comma-separated) |
-c, --columns |
--columns |
-w, --where |
--where (validated: single boolean expression, no subqueries) |
--json |
--format json (stable schema v1) |
-l, --limit |
--sample-limit |
Differences worth knowing: keys are inferred from declared constraints or
*_id conventions when you omit --key; unknown column names in filters are
an error, never silently ignored; and exit code 1 means "diff found"
(2 is reserved for operational errors), so CI can tell them apart.
Not yet ported: checksum-bisection hashdiff for very large cross-database diffs, which is reladiff's headline capability, plus MySQL, Oracle, ClickHouse, Trino and the rest of its connector list. If you need those today, use reladiff; the bisection port is the top item on our v0.2 roadmap and will credit its author.
Full command mapping and behavior differences: docs/migrating-from-data-diff.md.
Scope and limits (v0.1)
- Warehouses: Snowflake, Postgres, DuckDB, Parquet, CSV. BigQuery is next (v0.1.1).
- Every diff runs in local DuckDB. Postgres is attached read-only and
scanned in place; Snowflake is pulled once over Arrow with only the needed
columns. Both are capped at 50M rows and 10 GiB per side, so narrow the
comparison with
--where. Pushing the comparison into the warehouse, and lifting that cap with checksum bisection, are the next two pieces of work. - Postgres reads are unsnapshotted (the report says so in
execution.snapshot); Snowflake pulls are a single consistent SELECT. - Segment attribution is single-column, categorical, and descriptive. It says "over-represented", never causal.
Project
MIT, no CLA, no telemetry. The report schema is frozen at v1 and contract-tested, so pipelines and agents that parse it keep working across releases. Dependencies are deliberately few: DuckDB, PyArrow, sqlglot, click, rich.
What's next
BigQuery, then checksum-bisection hashdiff so large cross-database diffs stop needing a row cap (ported with credit to reladiff), then more connectors. Tracked in issues. Comment on the one you need and it moves up.
Contributing
git clone https://github.com/gauthierpiarrette/datadiffer && cd datadiffer
uv sync --group dev
uv run pytest -q # warehouse tests skip unless credentials are set
uv run ruff check .
Prior art gratefully acknowledged: data-diff and reladiff (Erez Shinan), whose checksum-bisection design v0.2 will port; Adtributor (Microsoft Research) for the attribution scoring; and DuckDB, which makes all of this fast enough to be boring.
License
MIT
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.