CrawlBit MCP
Provides four free tools to assess AI visibility: crawler access, entity recognition, off-page gaps, and shopping agent compatibility, without requiring an API key.
README
CrawlBit MCP
Four free tools that answer one question: can AI engines find, read and recognise a website?
No account. No API key. No signup. Nothing here runs a language model, so nothing here costs you or us anything.
"Can ChatGPT read stripe.com?"
"Why does AI never mention my store?"
"Where is my brand missing outside my own site?"
Ask in plain language. Your AI client picks the right tool.
Install
Requires Node.js 18+.
Claude Code
claude mcp add crawlbit -- npx -y crawlbit-mcp
Claude Desktop
Add to claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"crawlbit": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "crawlbit-mcp"]
}
}
}
Cursor
Add to .cursor/mcp.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"crawlbit": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "crawlbit-mcp"]
}
}
}
Restart your client. Four tools appear.
The four tools
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
crawlbit_crawler_watch |
Can GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended read this site? |
crawlbit_entity_check |
Does this brand read as a clear entity AI can recognise? |
crawlbit_offpage_gaps |
Where is this brand missing outside its own website? |
crawlbit_shopping |
Can AI shopping agents understand and recommend these products? |
Try these
Check whether AI crawlers can read example.com
Does example.com read as a clear brand entity to AI?
Where is example.com missing off-page, and which gap should we close first?
Compare example.com and competitor.com on AI crawler access
The tools compose. A useful sequence is: crawler access first (a blocked crawler makes everything else pointless), then the entity check, then the off-page gaps.
What this does NOT do
Written plainly, because an SEO tool that overstates itself is worse than no tool.
- It does not test whether AI actually cites a brand. That means running real buyer questions against ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude, reading the answers, and reporting who gets named instead of you. It costs real money per run and is not part of this free surface. These four tools measure the conditions that make a citation possible, which is a smaller claim.
crawler_watchreadsrobots.txtonly. It cannot see blocking done at the CDN, firewall or rate-limit layer. A site can pass here and still refuse the crawler in practice.entity_checkreads what the site publishes about itself. It says nothing about the brand's reputation across the rest of the web.shoppinginspects published structured data. It cannot see a merchant feed submitted privately to a platform.
If a site scores well on all four and still is not cited, the answer is almost always the same and it is not technical: too few third-party pages mention it. These tools will tell you that honestly rather than sell you a fix that does not exist.
Why only four tools
CrawlBit also runs a full technical audit and generates llms.txt. Both use a language model,
so both cost money per run, and neither is exposed here.
That is a deliberate line rather than a teaser. A free tool whose bill grows with its popularity
gets rate-limited, degraded or withdrawn the moment it succeeds, and the people who installed it
are the ones who pay for that. Everything in this server costs nothing to run, so nothing here
has to be taken back later. The audit and the llms.txt generator live at
crawlbit.app if you want them.
Rate limit
The API rate-limits per IP. Normal conversational use does not come close, and the server runs on your machine, so the budget is yours rather than shared. If you do hit it, you get a plain sentence rather than a stack trace.
Configuration
| Variable | Default | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
CRAWLBIT_BASE_URL |
https://www.crawlbit.app |
Point the server at another instance |
Privacy
The server runs locally and stores nothing. The only data leaving your machine is the URL you ask about, sent to the CrawlBit API to be analysed. There is no account, so there is nothing to tie a request to a person.
About
Built by CrawlBit, which measures AI visibility and does the off-page work that earns citations. The free tools here are the measurement half. The paid work is the other half, and you are not required to look at it to use this.
MIT licensed. Issues and pull requests welcome.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.