compliance-aiops
Converts audit trails from AIops agents into framework-mapped, tamper-evident compliance evidence bundles for HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, and GDPR.
README
<!-- mcp-name: io.github.AIops-tools/compliance-aiops -->
Compliance AIops (preview)
Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any framework body or GRC vendor. HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, GDPR and OSCAL are referenced descriptively; the frameworks and trademarks belong to their owners. MIT licensed.
Governed compliance-evidence tooling for AI-agent infrastructure ops. It
reads the audit trails your governed AIops agents already write — the local
~/.<tool>-aiops/audit.db SQLite trails, all sharing one audit_log schema —
and turns that activity into framework-mapped, hash-chain-sealed compliance
evidence. It never scans your infrastructure and never replaces a GRC
platform: it converts the trails you already produce into auditor-ready,
tamper-evident evidence bundles.
Unlike the other tools in the AIops-tools line it is not a platform wrapper: no external API, no network, no platform credentials. Its only inputs are those on-disk audit databases, read read-only. That also makes it the easiest-to-self-test tool in the line — fully offline and deterministic.
Preview. Evidence, not certification. Fully offline; the source
audit.dbfiles remain the system of record. OSCAL export is a documented v0.2 roadmap item (v0.1 emits JSON + Markdown + CSV shaped to ease a future OSCAL Assessment-Results adapter).
Key features
- Framework mapping with honest evidence-strength — audit events map to
HIPAA §164.312 / PCI-DSS v4.0 / SOC 2 TSC / GDPR controls. Audit trails
prove operating effectiveness strongly but control design / configuration
only partially, and each control is labelled
strongorpartial.gap_analysissays so per control, with the caveat and a remediation hint. - Hash-chain-sealed evidence bundles — SHA-256 over ordered records
(
hash = SHA-256(prev_hash ‖ canonical_json(record)), genesis prev = 64 zeros). ThechainHeadis reproducible for the same (framework, period, sources).verify_bundlecatches tampering;verify_source_chaindetects row-id gaps / deletions in a source trail. An optional HMAC signature seals a bundle under a stored signing key. - Zero-network, read-only — no credentials, no outbound calls, no mutation
of the source trails. Bundles are the only thing written, under
~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/. - Deterministic, test-verified integrity — the integrity claims are
themselves covered by tests: synthetic audit DBs are built through the real
governance-harness
AuditEngine, a golden reproduciblechainHeadis asserted, and tamper tests confirm detection. No live infrastructure needed.
Tools (15 MCP tools)
Read / analysis (12)
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
list_audit_sources |
Discovered sibling audit DBs (path, tool, readable, row count) |
query_audit_events |
Cross-tool event query — filter by tool/skill/status/risk/approved/selector/since/until |
activity_timeline |
Event counts bucketed by hour or day |
list_frameworks |
Supported frameworks + control counts |
coverage_summary |
Per-control covered/weak/uncovered for ONE framework |
control_evidence |
Evidence rows + population + a reproducible query for ONE control |
gap_analysis |
Controls with no/weak evidence + honest caveat + remediation |
approval_report |
High-risk write ops + who approved + rationale (the CC8.1 / PCI 7-8 / HIPAA §312(a) artifact) |
exceptions_report |
Denied / error / budget_exceeded ops — enforcement + anomaly evidence |
verify_source_chain |
Chain head + row-id gap detection for one source |
verify_bundle |
Verify a sealed bundle: chain + seal head + optional signature |
list_bundles |
Bundles under ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/ |
Write / artifact (3 — no external mutation)
| Tool | Risk | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
generate_evidence_bundle |
low | One call: coverage + approval trail + exceptions + sealed records → a bundle .json |
export_bundle |
low | Render a bundle to markdown / csv / json |
sign_bundle |
medium | HMAC over the seal using the stored signing key |
The CLI exposes a convenience subset; the full 15-tool surface is available over MCP.
Frameworks & controls
| Framework | Sample controls (strength) |
|---|---|
| HIPAA (§164.312) | 164.312(b) Audit controls (strong), 164.312(a)(1) Access control (strong), 164.312(c)(1) Integrity (strong) |
| PCI-DSS v4.0 | 10.2 Audit log content (strong), 10.3 Protect audit logs (strong), 7-8 Least privilege / authn (partial) |
| SOC 2 TSC | CC6.1 Logical access (strong), CC7.2 Monitoring (strong), CC8.1 Change management (strong) |
| GDPR | Art.30 Records of processing (partial), Art.32 Security of processing (strong) |
Install
uv tool install compliance-aiops # or: pipx install compliance-aiops
Quick start
compliance-aiops init # discover sibling ~/.*-aiops/audit.db, set org name, optional signing key
compliance-aiops doctor # which sibling audit DBs are present/readable
compliance-aiops overview # audit sources + per-framework covered/total
compliance-aiops report coverage soc2 # per-control SOC 2 coverage
compliance-aiops bundle generate soc2 # sealed evidence bundle → ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/
compliance-aiops bundle verify <path> # re-verify the chain + seal (+ signature)
Run as an MCP server (stdio):
export COMPLIANCE_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD=... # only needed to unlock a signing key
compliance-aiops mcp # or: compliance-aiops-mcp
Integrity & honest limits
- Tamper-EVIDENT, not tamper-PROOF. The hash chain and optional signature
let an auditor detect alteration; they do not prevent it. The source
audit.dbfiles remain the system of record — record thechainHeadout-of-band if you need an independent anchor. - Operating effectiveness vs. design. An audit trail strongly evidences that
a control ran (samples, approvals, denials) but only partially evidences that
a control is designed / configured correctly (e.g. MFA required,
least-privilege roles). Every control carries a
strong/partiallabel andgap_analysissurfaces the caveat rather than overclaiming.
Supported scope & limitations (preview)
- Evidence, not certification. This produces auditor-ready evidence bundles; it does not issue attestations, opinions, or certifications.
- In scope: the four frameworks above, over the
audit_logtrails written by governed AIops tools discovered via~/.*-aiops/audit.db. - Not in scope: it does not scan infrastructure, connect to any platform, or replace a GRC platform. For platform operations use the other AIops-tools.
- OSCAL export is v0.2. v0.1 emits JSON + Markdown + CSV.
- Preview: interfaces may change before v1.0.
Missing a capability?
Want another framework, control mapping, export format (OSCAL, CSV shape), or a verification you don't see here? Open an issue or a PR — contributions welcome.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.