compliance-aiops

compliance-aiops

Converts audit trails from AIops agents into framework-mapped, tamper-evident compliance evidence bundles for HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, and GDPR.

Category
Visit Server

README

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.AIops-tools/compliance-aiops -->

Compliance AIops (preview)

Disclaimer: Community-maintained open-source project. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by any framework body or GRC vendor. HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, GDPR and OSCAL are referenced descriptively; the frameworks and trademarks belong to their owners. MIT licensed.

Governed compliance-evidence tooling for AI-agent infrastructure ops. It reads the audit trails your governed AIops agents already write — the local ~/.<tool>-aiops/audit.db SQLite trails, all sharing one audit_log schema — and turns that activity into framework-mapped, hash-chain-sealed compliance evidence. It never scans your infrastructure and never replaces a GRC platform: it converts the trails you already produce into auditor-ready, tamper-evident evidence bundles.

Unlike the other tools in the AIops-tools line it is not a platform wrapper: no external API, no network, no platform credentials. Its only inputs are those on-disk audit databases, read read-only. That also makes it the easiest-to-self-test tool in the line — fully offline and deterministic.

Preview. Evidence, not certification. Fully offline; the source audit.db files remain the system of record. OSCAL export is a documented v0.2 roadmap item (v0.1 emits JSON + Markdown + CSV shaped to ease a future OSCAL Assessment-Results adapter).

Key features

  • Framework mapping with honest evidence-strength — audit events map to HIPAA §164.312 / PCI-DSS v4.0 / SOC 2 TSC / GDPR controls. Audit trails prove operating effectiveness strongly but control design / configuration only partially, and each control is labelled strong or partial. gap_analysis says so per control, with the caveat and a remediation hint.
  • Hash-chain-sealed evidence bundles — SHA-256 over ordered records (hash = SHA-256(prev_hash ‖ canonical_json(record)), genesis prev = 64 zeros). The chainHead is reproducible for the same (framework, period, sources). verify_bundle catches tampering; verify_source_chain detects row-id gaps / deletions in a source trail. An optional HMAC signature seals a bundle under a stored signing key.
  • Zero-network, read-only — no credentials, no outbound calls, no mutation of the source trails. Bundles are the only thing written, under ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/.
  • Deterministic, test-verified integrity — the integrity claims are themselves covered by tests: synthetic audit DBs are built through the real governance-harness AuditEngine, a golden reproducible chainHead is asserted, and tamper tests confirm detection. No live infrastructure needed.

Tools (15 MCP tools)

Read / analysis (12)

Tool Purpose
list_audit_sources Discovered sibling audit DBs (path, tool, readable, row count)
query_audit_events Cross-tool event query — filter by tool/skill/status/risk/approved/selector/since/until
activity_timeline Event counts bucketed by hour or day
list_frameworks Supported frameworks + control counts
coverage_summary Per-control covered/weak/uncovered for ONE framework
control_evidence Evidence rows + population + a reproducible query for ONE control
gap_analysis Controls with no/weak evidence + honest caveat + remediation
approval_report High-risk write ops + who approved + rationale (the CC8.1 / PCI 7-8 / HIPAA §312(a) artifact)
exceptions_report Denied / error / budget_exceeded ops — enforcement + anomaly evidence
verify_source_chain Chain head + row-id gap detection for one source
verify_bundle Verify a sealed bundle: chain + seal head + optional signature
list_bundles Bundles under ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/

Write / artifact (3 — no external mutation)

Tool Risk Purpose
generate_evidence_bundle low One call: coverage + approval trail + exceptions + sealed records → a bundle .json
export_bundle low Render a bundle to markdown / csv / json
sign_bundle medium HMAC over the seal using the stored signing key

The CLI exposes a convenience subset; the full 15-tool surface is available over MCP.

Frameworks & controls

Framework Sample controls (strength)
HIPAA (§164.312) 164.312(b) Audit controls (strong), 164.312(a)(1) Access control (strong), 164.312(c)(1) Integrity (strong)
PCI-DSS v4.0 10.2 Audit log content (strong), 10.3 Protect audit logs (strong), 7-8 Least privilege / authn (partial)
SOC 2 TSC CC6.1 Logical access (strong), CC7.2 Monitoring (strong), CC8.1 Change management (strong)
GDPR Art.30 Records of processing (partial), Art.32 Security of processing (strong)

Install

uv tool install compliance-aiops      # or: pipx install compliance-aiops

Quick start

compliance-aiops init                 # discover sibling ~/.*-aiops/audit.db, set org name, optional signing key
compliance-aiops doctor               # which sibling audit DBs are present/readable
compliance-aiops overview             # audit sources + per-framework covered/total
compliance-aiops report coverage soc2 # per-control SOC 2 coverage
compliance-aiops bundle generate soc2 # sealed evidence bundle → ~/.compliance-aiops/bundles/
compliance-aiops bundle verify <path> # re-verify the chain + seal (+ signature)

Run as an MCP server (stdio):

export COMPLIANCE_AIOPS_MASTER_PASSWORD=...   # only needed to unlock a signing key
compliance-aiops mcp                          # or: compliance-aiops-mcp

Integrity & honest limits

  • Tamper-EVIDENT, not tamper-PROOF. The hash chain and optional signature let an auditor detect alteration; they do not prevent it. The source audit.db files remain the system of record — record the chainHead out-of-band if you need an independent anchor.
  • Operating effectiveness vs. design. An audit trail strongly evidences that a control ran (samples, approvals, denials) but only partially evidences that a control is designed / configured correctly (e.g. MFA required, least-privilege roles). Every control carries a strong / partial label and gap_analysis surfaces the caveat rather than overclaiming.

Supported scope & limitations (preview)

  • Evidence, not certification. This produces auditor-ready evidence bundles; it does not issue attestations, opinions, or certifications.
  • In scope: the four frameworks above, over the audit_log trails written by governed AIops tools discovered via ~/.*-aiops/audit.db.
  • Not in scope: it does not scan infrastructure, connect to any platform, or replace a GRC platform. For platform operations use the other AIops-tools.
  • OSCAL export is v0.2. v0.1 emits JSON + Markdown + CSV.
  • Preview: interfaces may change before v1.0.

Missing a capability?

Want another framework, control mapping, export format (OSCAL, CSV shape), or a verification you don't see here? Open an issue or a PR — contributions welcome.

Recommended Servers

playwright-mcp

playwright-mcp

A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Magic Component Platform (MCP)

Magic Component Platform (MCP)

An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
Audiense Insights MCP Server

Audiense Insights MCP Server

Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.

Official
Featured
Local
TypeScript
VeyraX MCP

VeyraX MCP

Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.

Official
Featured
Local
graphlit-mcp-server

graphlit-mcp-server

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.

Official
Featured
TypeScript
Kagi MCP Server

Kagi MCP Server

An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.

Official
Featured
Python
E2B

E2B

Using MCP to run code via e2b.

Official
Featured
Neon Database

Neon Database

MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases

Official
Featured
Exa Search

Exa Search

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.

Official
Featured
Qdrant Server

Qdrant Server

This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.

Official
Featured