CodeMore MCP Server
Enables AI agents to scan code for security and quality issues and receive machine-readable reports with suggested fixes and verification criteria.
README
<div align="center">
<img width="125" height="125" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d0e5d020-38ce-44f7-9426-f7fb1b931130" />
CodeMore
The static analyzer your AI agent reads.
AI agents ship code fast — and ship bugs fast. CodeMore scans the code, then hands the agent that wrote it a machine-readable report with the exact fix and the criteria to verify it. The agent closes its own findings.
Website · Docs · Rule Catalog · Report Schema · Changelog
npx codemore@latest scan .
59 native rules · 8 external adapters · CLI · MCP server · VS Code extension · GitHub Action — one report, byte-identical on every surface.
</div>
Table of contents
- Why CodeMore
- Quick start — CLI · MCP server · VS Code · GitHub Action · Hosted
- What it catches
- The report is the product
- Agentic fix loop
- Accuracy, measured honestly
- What CodeMore does not catch
- Architecture
- Development · Contributing · License
Why CodeMore
AI-assisted coding ships vulnerabilities at a measured, growing rate:
| Finding | Source |
|---|---|
| 45% of AI-generated code carries an OWASP Top-10 vulnerability | Veracode 2025/26 |
| 98% of 1,072 scanned vibe-coded sites had ≥ 1 security flaw | Symbiotic |
| 70% of audited Lovable apps shipped with Supabase RLS disabled | DEV |
| 2× baseline secret-leak rate on AI-tool-assisted commits | GitGuardian SOSS 2026 |
| 35 CVEs/month attributed to AI-generated code (was 6/month in January) | March 2026 |
Existing scanners (SonarQube, DeepSource, Snyk) target human reviewers sitting at dashboards. But this code wasn't written by a human — and the LLM that wrote it is fully capable of fixing its own bug, if the report is shaped for a machine reader.
That's the wedge. CodeMore is not another SAST dashboard. It's the report contract between a scanner and a coding agent: every finding carries a suggestedFix with a patch template and explicit verificationCriteria — not just "here's a problem," but "here's exactly how to know you fixed it."
The agent that wrote the bug can also write the fix — if it can read the report.
Quick start
CLI
npx codemore@latest scan .
Prints a summary to the terminal. Add --json for the full report on stdout, or --out codemore-report.json to write it to disk: every finding pinned to file:line:column with rule citation, fix template, and verification criteria. Pipe it to your agent and watch findings close.
npm install -g codemore # once — or prefix each command below with `npx codemore@latest`
codemore scan . --fail-on BLOCKER # CI gate: non-zero exit on any BLOCKER
codemore scan . --external-tools ruff,biome # opt in to external tools
codemore scan . --external-tools all # ruff · golangci-lint · clippy · biome · bandit · gitleaks · npm-audit · pip-audit
codemore scan . --format sarif --out codemore.sarif # GitHub code scanning (upload-sarif)
codemore fix . --rule <id> --write # agentic fix loop from the CLI (needs an LLM API key)
codemore baseline create # adopt on an existing repo without drowning in legacy findings
MCP server — Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Claude Desktop
npx codemore mcp # print config snippet + every client's config path
npx codemore mcp install --client cursor # merge into existing config (backs up first, --dry-run supported)
<details> <summary>Manual config snippet</summary>
{
"mcpServers": {
"codemore": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "codemore@latest", "serve-mcp"]
}
}
}
</details>
Six tools exposed: scan_project · scan_file · explain_issue · suggest_fix · apply_fix · validate_fix.
VS Code extension
Install CodeMore from the VS Code Marketplace (Extensions → search "CodeMore" → Install), or build the VSIX yourself:
npm run vsce:package # builds codemore-<version>.vsix
code --install-extension codemore-<version>.vsix
Inline diagnostics; code-action quick-fix invokes the agentic loop (plan → generate → validate → retry, max 3 attempts).
GitHub Action
# .github/workflows/codemore.yml
on:
pull_request:
branches: [main]
jobs:
scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: write
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: abhinavteja123/codemore@v1
with:
fail-on: BLOCKER
PR-comment bot; only fails the build on findings new since the committed .codemore-baseline.json. A full copy-paste security gate chaining CodeMore + Ruff + Biome + Bandit + Gitleaks + npm-audit + pip-audit + Checkov lives at templates/.github/workflows/codemore-security-gate.yml (walkthrough).
Web Scanner (hosted)
Sign in at codemore.tech, paste a public GitHub URL or upload a ZIP — same report, same fingerprint, zero install.
What it catches
59 native rules across 6 packs, every rule mapped to a cited real-world incident class — not a hypothetical:
| Pack | Rules | Highlights |
|---|---|---|
core-security |
22 | SQL injection (concat), path traversal, weak crypto, insecure deserialization, eval, shell injection, TLS-off, hardcoded secret patterns, hardcoded passwords (B105-class), SSRF, secret-in-log, LLM-output → eval/exec/SQL sinks, prompt-injection sinks, DB write-without-WHERE, hallucinated imports |
core-quality |
21 | Unused vars/imports/exports, cyclomatic complexity, dead conditionals, leftover console/prints, async-without-await, unreachable code, loose equality, as any, non-null-assertion abuse |
vibe-frontend |
6 | XSS (dangerouslySetInnerHTML), CORS-with-credentials, missing rate limit, missing cookie flags, file-upload validation, missing input validation |
vibe-secrets |
4 | Public env leaks (NEXT_PUBLIC_* / VITE_* / REACT_APP_*), hardcoded JWTs, MCP config secrets, CI/CD YAML secrets |
vibe-auth |
3 | BOLA, missing session checks, inverted auth |
vibe-supabase |
3 | RLS-off, RLS-permissive (USING (true)), anon-key bundled to client |
8 external adapters (off by default, opt in via --external-tools): ruff · golangci-lint · clippy · biome · bandit · gitleaks · npm-audit · pip-audit. Findings are namespaced ext:<tool>:<rule-id> — no collision with native rules; a missing binary skips silently instead of crashing.
The walker catches what .gitignore hides. When a developer "hides" a leaked secret file by gitignoring it, most scanners stop seeing it — but it's still on disk, in tarballs, in Docker images. CodeMore always scans secret-shaped filenames (.env*, *.pem, *.key, firebase-adminsdk*.json, credentials.json, .npmrc, .pypirc, …) even when gitignored. This is exactly how the audits found real production OpenAI keys, Google API keys, and Firebase admin SDK creds that other tools silently missed. Opt out with --respect-gitignore-fully.
Per-rule documentation: docs/rules — 59 pages, one per rule.
The report is the product
Every surface emits the same schema-stable codemore-report.json — verified byte-identical (modulo timestamps and instance IDs) on every release by test/parity.test.ts:
CLI : issues=224 BLOCKER=5 fingerprint=sha256:7f95f2c62e0d3ecea6f23…
MCP : issues=224 BLOCKER=5 fingerprint=sha256:7f95f2c62e0d3ecea6f23…
Daemon : issues=224 BLOCKER=5 fingerprint=sha256:7f95f2c62e0d3ecea6f23…
One brain, four skins. The schema is the API; surfaces are interchangeable.
<details> <summary><b>Full report example</b> — <code>codemore-report.json</code> v1.0.0</summary>
{
"schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
"tool": { "name": "codemore", "version": "0.2.8" },
"project": { "root": ".", "framework": "next.js", "language": "typescript",
"fingerprint": "sha256:7f95f2c62e0d3ecea6f23…" },
"summary": {
"issuesTotal": 42,
"bySeverity": { "BLOCKER": 2, "CRITICAL": 5, "MAJOR": 15, "MINOR": 18, "INFO": 2 },
"byCategory": { "security": 12, "bug": 7, "…": "…" },
"filesAnalyzed": 87,
"linesOfCode": 12450,
"technicalDebtMinutes": 1840
},
"issues": [
{
"id": "vibe-supabase-rls-disabled",
"ruleVersion": "1.2.0",
"instanceId": "01HZ…",
"severity": "BLOCKER",
"confidence": 0.95,
"category": "security",
"title": "Supabase table has no RLS policy",
"evidence": {
"file": "supabase/migrations/001_init.sql",
"line": 14, "column": 1, "endLine": 14, "endColumn": 60,
"snippet": "create table profiles (id uuid primary key, …);",
"matchedPattern": "create-table-without-rls"
},
"whyItMatters": "Public Supabase client can read/write all rows. 70 % of Lovable apps leak data through this.",
"citation": "https://codemore.tech/rules/vibe-supabase-rls-disabled",
"suggestedFix": {
"type": "code-patch",
"instructions": "Add `ALTER TABLE profiles ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;` plus at least one policy scoped to authenticated users.",
"patchTemplate": "…",
"verificationCriteria": [
"Migration contains ALTER TABLE … ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY",
"At least one CREATE POLICY exists for the table",
"Re-scan no longer reports vibe-supabase-rls-disabled for this file"
]
},
"suppression": {
"available": true,
"directive": "// codemore-ignore: vibe-supabase-rls-disabled",
"scope": "same-line | next-line | file"
}
}
],
"agentInstructions": {
"preamble": "You are fixing issues found by CodeMore. Apply patches one issue at a time. After each, request re-scan via validate_fix.",
"orderingHint": "blockers → criticals → majors",
"doNotTouch": ["node_modules/**", "*.lock", ".env*"],
"stopOn": "first-validator-failure"
},
"meta": {
"rulesEnabled": 59,
"packsLoaded": ["core-security", "core-quality", "vibe-supabase", "…"],
"scanDurationMs": 4321
}
}
</details>
Schema source-of-truth: shared/report/schema.json. Breaking changes bump schemaVersion major and ship a migration guide.
Agentic fix loop
apply_fix runs a four-stage loop, up to 3 retries per finding — it terminates on first PASS and never silently keeps a failing patch:
detect ──► plan ──► generate ──► validate
│
├──► (fail) → re-plan, retry (≤ 3)
└──► (pass) → apply patch · next finding
agenticFixer.ts— orchestrator; reads finding + rule citation + framework contextvalidatorHarness.ts— applies the patch in a tempdir copy, re-runs the rule, re-runs file-scoped tests, returnspass | fail+ diagnostics- LLM provider plug-ins: OpenAI · Anthropic · Gemini · local, configurable via workspace setting (VS Code) or
CODEMORE_LLM_PROVIDERenv (CLI)
Accuracy, measured honestly
Synthetic benchmarks lie; real codebases don't. Every release is audited against real projects, and the numbers are published — including the bad ones.
2026-07-07 audit (full report) — 7 codebases (Python app, 1.35M-LOC TS monorepo, polyglot Rust, synthetic ground-truth apps, self-scan): 100% of planted vulnerabilities detected, a real OpenAI key caught in a production .env, ~90% BLOCKER true-positive rate, self-scan noise reduced 85% after fixing four false-positive classes.
2026-06-12 audit (full report) — 10 real codebases, aggregate ~85% BLOCKER TP rate, above DeepSource's ≥ 75% production bar:
<details> <summary>Per-project results</summary>
| Project | Findings | BLOCKERs | TP rate | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EchoVault | 122 | 10 | 100% | Real Supabase RLS holes |
| ProofSnap | 134 | 4 | 100% | |
| AImentor | 224 | 5 | 100% | Real OpenAI keys hidden by .gitignore |
| Hackathonnn | 129 | 3 | 100% | |
| shopsec | 113 | 5 | 100% | |
| Senti | 155 | 8 | 100% | |
| open-design | 8,615 | 101 | ~80% | |
| Gen ai | 63 | 4 | 75% | Real Firebase admin SDK creds |
| codemore self | 282 | 6 | 17% | Intentional landing-demo data |
| Aggregate (excl. self) | 9,755 | 140 | ~85% |
</details>
Quality gates, enforced in CI
- 100% TP / 100% FP on the 118-fixture corpus regression suite — every rule ships with at least one true-positive and one false-positive fixture under
corpus/rules/<rule-id>/{tp,fp}/ - Lifecycle gating: rules are
experimental→beta→stable, promotion requires fixture pairs plus real-world FP-rate evidence via opt-in telemetry; rules below the precision bar are gated behind--enable-experimentalor ship with reduced confidence so agents weight them lower
| Lifecycle | Default | Promotion bar |
|---|---|---|
experimental |
off by default | one fixture pair |
beta |
on by default | ≥ 3 fixture pairs + 14-day FP rate < 15% |
stable |
ships in default pack | 30-day FP rate < 5% + reference apps clean |
deprecated |
warns, removed next major | — |
What CodeMore does not catch
Out of scope by design — static analysis can't judge these, and an agent can't auto-fix them from a source diff. The rule is "agent-actionable or it's not a rule":
Weak password policies · audit-log completeness · business-logic flaws · race conditions · open S3/GCS buckets · DAST findings · MFA presence.
Full list with reasoning: docs/limitations.md. For these, pair CodeMore with OWASP ZAP, Burp Suite, checkov, or your IdP's compliance dashboard.
Telemetry — opt-in only
Off by default. Enable per-scan with --telemetry. Collected: tool version, hashed project fingerprint, surface, rule-fire events. Never collected: file paths, contents, snippets, evidence text — the endpoint enforces a Zod strict() schema and rejects any payload containing those keys with HTTP 400. 64 KB payload cap, per-fingerprint rate limiting, RLS denies all reads.
Architecture
codemore/
├── shared/ ← one brain, shared across all surfaces
│ ├── packs/ ← 59 rule modules across 6 packs
│ ├── rules/ ← registry, lifecycle gating, suppression, AST helpers (TS + Python)
│ └── report/ ← codemore-report.json v1.0.0 schema + types + writer
├── daemon/
│ ├── cli/ ← CLI entry · walker · ignore resolver · baseline diff
│ ├── mcp/ ← MCP server (6 tools)
│ ├── external/ ← 8 opt-in adapters, fail-loud parsers
│ ├── services/ ← agentic fixer · validator harness · scan orchestrator
│ └── llm/ ← OpenAI · Anthropic · Gemini · local provider plug-ins
├── src/ ← VS Code extension (forks daemon, renders diagnostics)
├── web/ ← Next.js: landing · dashboard · docs · /api/telemetry
├── corpus/rules/<id>/{tp,fp}/ ← 59 TP/FP fixture pairs, 1:1 with the rule catalog
├── docs/ ← schema · limitations · security-gate · 59 per-rule pages
└── templates/ ← copy-paste GitHub Action workflows
One brain (shared/), four skins (CLI, MCP, extension, Action), one report schema — kept honest by the parity test, not by a slogan.
Development
git clone https://github.com/abhinavteja123/codemore
cd codemore
npm ci # postinstall skips binary downloads in dev automatically
npx tsc -p tsconfig.publish.json # type-check the publishable surface
npm run test:unit # unit tests (mocha + ts-node)
npx mocha --require ts-node/register test/parity.test.ts # surface-parity proof
node cli.js scan corpus/rules/vibe-no-rate-limit/tp --json --enable-experimental
cd web && npm ci && npm run dev # landing + dashboard + docs → localhost:3000
VS Code extension: F5 in VS Code, or npm run watch + code --extensionDevelopmentPath=.
Contributing
Two paths:
- New rules — read
CONTRIBUTING-RULES.md. The PR bot gates every submission: rule module + TP fixture (must fire) + FP fixture (must not fire) + docs page + pack registration. The bot is the first reviewer; humans review after it passes. - Everything else (CLI, MCP, extension, daemon, web, docs) — read
CONTRIBUTING.md.
Before opening a PR:
npx tsc -p tsconfig.publish.json # type-check
node scripts/validate-rule-pr.js # rule-PR bot equivalent (must report "passed")
node scripts/measure-accuracy.js # corpus regression (must stay 100% TP / 100% FP)
npm run test:unit # full unit suite
Found a false positive? Open a rule-FP report — FP reports directly feed the beta→stable promotion pipeline.
Security findings: do not open a public issue — use GitHub's private vulnerability reporting flow (SECURITY.md).
Roadmap
- MCP registry listing (VS Code Marketplace: live)
- Demo video: open a real vibe-coded app, scan, hand the report to Claude Code, watch every BLOCKER close
- 50-app benchmark study with published dataset
- Telemetry-driven rule auto-demotion (nightly workflow)
- JetBrains plugin · cross-language taint tracking (research)
Details: docs/roadmap.md.
License
MIT — see LICENSE. CodeMore is open source from line one and stays that way. The wedge is the report contract, not gatekeeping.
<div align="center">
The static analyzer your AI agent reads.
Website · Docs · Rules · Schema · npm · Code of Conduct
</div>
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.