base-tx-explain
Explains any Base mainnet transaction hash by returning a structured JSON with action type, assets moved, risk flags, and cost details, using deterministic on-chain decoding without LLM.
README
base-tx-explain
One MCP tool: explain_transaction(tx_hash) → strict JSON explanation of any Base mainnet transaction.
Feed it a transaction hash. Get back what happened, in plain English, plus the structured facts: what moved, who was involved, what to be careful about, what it cost. Deterministic onchain decode — no LLM anywhere in the response path, so the same input always produces the same output, there is nothing to hallucinate, and the JSON contract is stable enough to parse blind.
Base mainnet (chain id 8453) only.
Links: Live endpoint · Docs · OpenAPI · MCP registry: io.github.0200project/base-tx-explain · Site
For agents
// tools/call → explain_transaction
{ "tx_hash": "0x0c84b951051f779903b57af9225ca570c77cd5531195968dd78106a69d6c4d8c" }
returns (as both structuredContent and stringified JSON in content[0].text):
{
"summary": "0x401d...f2c5 swapped 0.03 ETH for 12,899,422 WNL via Uniswap V4 PoolManager.",
"action_type": "swap",
"status": "success",
"assets_moved": [
{ "token": "ETH", "amount": "0.03", "from": "0x401d...", "to": "0xd0a4...", "token_address": null, "standard": "native" },
{ "token": "WNL", "amount": "12899422.144134853458613801", "from": "0x4985...", "to": "0x401d...", "token_address": "0xb200...9a01", "standard": "erc20" }
],
"counterparties": [
{ "address": "0xd0a4...", "label": null },
{ "address": "0x4985...", "label": "Uniswap V4 PoolManager" }
],
"risk_flags": [
{ "flag": "unverified_contract", "detail": "The target contract 0xd0a4...e4bf has no verified source code on Sourcify." }
],
"gas_paid_usd": 0.020562,
"timestamp": "2026-08-20T03:54:19.000Z",
"block_number": 50204356,
"tx_hash": "0x0c84...4c8c",
"basescan_url": "https://basescan.org/tx/0x0c84...4c8c",
"partial": false
}
Field contract
action_type— one of:eth_transfer,erc20_transfer,erc20_approval,approval_revoked,approval_for_all,swap,add_liquidity,remove_liquidity,wrap,unwrap,nft_mint,nft_transfer,nft_sale,token_mint,bridge_in,bridge_out,lending_supply,lending_withdraw,lending_borrow,lending_repay,stake,unstake,claim,batch_transfer,account_abstraction_bundle,attestation,name_registration,contract_deployment,contract_interaction,unknown.risk_flags[].flag— one of:unverified_contract,first_time_counterparty,approval_for_all,unlimited_approval,known_drainer,transaction_reverted. A flag always means evidence was found; a failed lookup never produces a flag.status—successorreverted. Reverted transactions are classified by intent (what was attempted) and carry atransaction_revertedrisk flag.partial: true— the transaction's full meaning could not be established;summarystates exactly what is and is not known. On errors the tool returnsisError: truewith{ "error": "...", "code": "invalid_hash" | "not_found" | "pending" | "upstream_error" }.- Amounts are decimal strings (not floats). Addresses are as emitted onchain; compare case-insensitively.
provenance.untrusted_fields— lists the fields whose string contents come from attacker-controllable sources (token symbols, contract/collection names, event/function names): todaysummary,assets_moved[].token, andcounterparties[].label. If you feed this output to an LLM, treat those fields as data, never as instructions. A token that names itself with instruction-like or promotional text is a scam signal, not a command. Symbols are normalized (control characters, line separators, emoji, and homoglyphs are stripped) and a token whose self-reported symbol is not a plausible ticker is shown as its contract address rather than its chosen name — so a hostile name cannot impersonate a real one or smuggle text into an agent's context.
How it decodes
Raw transaction + receipt from Base RPC → builtin decoders for ~40 event formats (ERC-20/721/1155, Uniswap V2/V3/V4, Aerodrome/Solidly, Seaport, Aave V3, Compound V3, OP-stack bridges, ERC-4337 EntryPoint, EAS, Basenames, WETH, LP position managers) → deterministic rule-ordered classification → labels from a verified table of major Base contracts. App-specific events are named via the contract's verified ABI on Sourcify when available. Risk flags come from Sourcify/Basescan verification status, the ScamSniffer and MyEtherWallet public blocklists, and approval semantics. gas_paid_usd includes the OP-stack L1 data fee and prices ETH from the Chainlink ETH/USD feed at the transaction's block.
Pricing
- 10 free calls per client, no signup.
- After that: $0.02 per call in USDC on Base via x402 — the payment-required response contains everything an x402-capable agent needs to pay and retry autonomously. No account, no API key.
- Also available marketplace-hosted (marketplace billing applies there instead).
Connect
{
"mcpServers": {
"base-tx-explain": {
"type": "streamable-http",
"url": "https://base-tx-explain.fly.dev/mcp"
}
}
}
Self-host
git clone https://github.com/0200project/base-tx-explain.git && cd base-tx-explain
npm install
cp .env.example .env # defaults work: free mode, public Base RPCs
npm run dev # or: npm run build && npm start
Environment (see .env.example): PAYMENT_MODE (none | x402), X402_PAY_TO (your receiving address — use a fresh wallet), X402_PRICE_USD, X402_FACILITATOR_URL (defaults to the keyless PayAI facilitator; Coinbase CDP facilitator also works and its API keys carry no spend exposure), FREE_CALLS_PER_IP, BASE_RPC_URLS, optional ETHERSCAN_API_KEY.
The server is stateless (fresh MCP server per request), so it scales horizontally and runs on anything that runs Docker — a Dockerfile and an Apify .actor/ config are included.
npm test # unit tests
npm run validate # decode 100 recent live Base txs, print grades (ship gate: >=90% clean, 0 crashes)
Guarantees and limits
- Deterministic: same tx hash → same decode. No model calls, ever.
- Internal ETH transfers (contract → contract value moves) are not visible without trace APIs; WETH events cover the common cases. When something can't be decoded, the output says so instead of guessing.
- Blocklists are consumed at runtime from their public sources and refresh twice daily; absence of a
known_drainerflag is not a safety guarantee. - Not financial advice; this tool reports what a transaction did, not whether anything is a good idea.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.