a2a2p
a2a2p is an open protocol for turning intent into physical things: describe what must be true about the world (holds 15 kg, outdoors, ten years) and get back a manufacturable specification, a deterministic engineering review, and a price. The specification is public domain (CC0) and implementable by anyone; a2a2p.com is a free reference implementation with no API key required.
README
a2a2p — Agent-to-Agent-to-Physical
An open protocol for turning intent into physical things.
An AI agent can reason about a bracket. It cannot make one exist. a2a2p is the missing layer: describe what needs to be true about the world, and get back a manufacturable specification, an engineering review grounded in real material properties and real geometry, and a price.
The specification is public domain (CC0) — implement it freely,
including in products competing with this one. a2a2p.com is a reference
implementation, not the protocol.
Abundance arrives as the distance between knowing what is needed and the thing existing collapses toward zero. Today that distance is mostly friction. This is an attempt to remove it.
Try it in 30 seconds
No API key. No signup. No auth.
claude mcp add --transport http a2a2p https://a2a2p.com/mcp
Or any MCP client:
{ "mcpServers": { "a2a2p": { "type": "http", "url": "https://a2a2p.com/mcp" } } }
Client only speaks stdio? Bridge to it:
npx a2a2p-bridge # or: docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/deadlypillow/a2a2p
The bridge is dependency-free and takes A2A2P_ENDPOINT, so it works against
any implementation of the spec, not just this one.
Or plain HTTP:
curl -X POST https://a2a2p.com/api/review \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"intent":{"purpose":"Outdoor bracket holding a 10kg sensor in direct sun","environment":["outdoor","uv_exposure"],"quantity":20},
"specification":{"process":"fdm_3d_print","material":"pla","tolerance_class":"precision"}}'
You get back, instantly: PLA degrades in UV — specify a UV-stable grade or switch material. As-printed accuracy is ±0.2–0.5 mm; "precision" needs post-machining or a relaxed class. Plus a quote-readiness score and what to add to raise it. Nothing is stored.
Capabilities
| Tool | What it does | Latency |
|---|---|---|
review_specification |
Engineering review: material properties, process/tolerance compatibility, environment fit, quantity economics. Findings ranked blocker/warning/info. | instant, stateless |
get_supply_options |
Pricing and lead time. Real quotes where a provider can serve it; deterministic estimates otherwise — never conflated. Attach an STL (measured fully) or a STEP file (envelope, units, machining complexity). | instant |
request_physical_solution |
Full resolution: recommended path, buy-vs-make, delivery plan. Returns immediately with the review embedded. | sub-second |
check_request_status |
Retrieve the resolution report. | instant |
Also served: /spec · /conformance · /policy · /api/providers · /llms.txt · /schema
The idea worth stealing
A physical requirement has two layers, and conflating them is the main reason manufacturing communication fails:
- Intent — what must be true about the world. "Holds 15 kg, outdoors, ten years."
- Specification — what object satisfies that. "6061-T6, 4 mm, anodized."
Most systems demand the second and discard the first. Then, downstream, someone proposes a substitution and nobody knows what the part was for. a2a2p accepts intent alone as a complete request — deriving the specification is the protocol's central act of value — and carries the intent forward permanently.
Two rules in the spec are normative, and they are worth adopting even if you use none of this code:
- An estimate MUST NOT be presented as a quote (§5.2.1). An agent that cannot tell a computed guess from a commitment will eventually commit real money to a fiction.
- Anything that fabricates MUST screen requests and publish its policy (§5.5). Silent refusal is non-conformant — an agent that cannot learn why it was refused cannot correct course.
Conformance
L1 Speaks → L2 Prices → L3 Resolves → L4 Fabricates. Self-declared;
there is deliberately no certifying authority.
Verify any implementation yourself — the suite ships with the spec:
node tests/conformance.mjs https://a2a2p.com # or your own endpoint
38 assertions, each citing the spec section it enforces. It deliberately cannot prove fabrication (that would mean placing real orders), so it verifies the L4 prerequisites and records the fulfilment claim as unproven — otherwise any implementation could publish a policy, make nothing, and pass as L4.
This implementation declares L3 and publishes exactly where it falls short at
/conformance — including that L4 is unmet,
that STEP files yield envelope and complexity but not solid volume, and that deterministic screening
cannot read intent. An implementation that will not hold itself to its own spec
has written a brochure.
Honest status
Built deliberately ahead of demand. As of July 2026:
- ✅ Assessment, pricing, geometry measurement, screening, and resolution reports are live and free.
- ⚠️ No connected manufacturer can currently fabricate. Industry research (docs/SUPPLY_BRIDGE_RESEARCH.md) found that no CNC or sheet-metal vendor exposes a self-serve buyer-side quoting API — self-serve programmatic ordering exists only in 3D printing and PCB. Fulfilment is currently human-brokered.
- 📐 STL meshes are measured fully (volume, area, complexity). STEP files yield envelope, declared units, and feature-based machining complexity; solid volume needs a B-rep kernel and is reported as unknown rather than guessed.
If you are a manufacturer with a programmatic quoting API, or building one: hello@a2a2p.com. That is the bottleneck for everyone in this space, not just for us.
Repository
SPEC.md the specification (CC0) — the actual product
src/worker.js reference implementation (Cloudflare Worker)
src/schema.js canonical requirement schema
src/review.js deterministic engineering review engine
src/geometry.js STL mesh measurement (volume, area, complexity)
src/step.js STEP entity-graph parsing (envelope, units, features)
src/supply.js provider adapters + parametric estimator
src/screening.js intake screening (the governance rail)
src/telemetry.js demand instrumentation
bridge/index.js stdio <-> Streamable HTTP bridge (dependency-free)
Dockerfile runs the bridge; for clients and registries that run servers
tests/test-worker.mjs regression suite
tests/calibration.mjs pricing model vs real published prices
tests/conformance.mjs spec conformance suite — runs against ANY implementation
docs/ research, listings kit, market watch
PROTOCOL_LOG.md build log — every session, decision, and failure
Run the tests: node tests/test-worker.mjs · Deploy: npx wrangler deploy
Contributing
Implementations of the spec, conformance reports, corrections, and competing implementations are all welcome — that is what a standard is for. Issues and PRs here, or hello@a2a2p.com.
Licensing, in two parts (see LICENSE):
- Specification (
SPEC.md) — CC0 1.0, public domain. Implement it freely, including in competing products, without permission or attribution. - Implementation (everything else) — MIT.
a2a2p — when agents need things to exist.
Recommended Servers
playwright-mcp
A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with web pages through structured accessibility snapshots without requiring vision models or screenshots.
Magic Component Platform (MCP)
An AI-powered tool that generates modern UI components from natural language descriptions, integrating with popular IDEs to streamline UI development workflow.
Audiense Insights MCP Server
Enables interaction with Audiense Insights accounts via the Model Context Protocol, facilitating the extraction and analysis of marketing insights and audience data including demographics, behavior, and influencer engagement.
VeyraX MCP
Single MCP tool to connect all your favorite tools: Gmail, Calendar and 40 more.
graphlit-mcp-server
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server enables integration between MCP clients and the Graphlit service. Ingest anything from Slack to Gmail to podcast feeds, in addition to web crawling, into a Graphlit project - and then retrieve relevant contents from the MCP client.
Kagi MCP Server
An MCP server that integrates Kagi search capabilities with Claude AI, enabling Claude to perform real-time web searches when answering questions that require up-to-date information.
E2B
Using MCP to run code via e2b.
Neon Database
MCP server for interacting with Neon Management API and databases
Exa Search
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server lets AI assistants like Claude use the Exa AI Search API for web searches. This setup allows AI models to get real-time web information in a safe and controlled way.
Qdrant Server
This repository is an example of how to create a MCP server for Qdrant, a vector search engine.